Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33754250›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2021

Effect of Agitation and Aeration on Keratinase Production in Bioreactors Using Bioprocess Engineering Aspects.

Irem Deniz, Tugce Demir, Suphi S Oncel, E Esin Hames, Fazilet Vardar-Sukan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irem DenizBioengineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45140, Muradiye-Manisa, Turkey. iremdenz@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1171-8259
Tugce DemirDepartment of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ege University, 35100, Bornova-Izmir, Turkey.
Suphi S OncelBioengineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ege University, 35100, Bornova-Izmir, Turkey.
E Esin HamesBioengineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ege University, 35100, Bornova-Izmir, Turkey.
Fazilet Vardar-SukanSUNUM Nanotechnology Research and Application Center, Sabancı University, 34956, Tuzla-Istanbul, Turkey.
Ege University · TRManisa Celal Bayar University · TRSabancı Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptomyces sp. 2M21 was evaluated for keratinase production in bioreactors using chicken feathers. Firstly, optimization of bioengineering parameters (agitation and aeration rates) using Response Surface Methodology was carried out in 2 L bioreactors. Optimized conditions identified by the modified quadratic model were verified as 150 rpm and 1 vvm experimentally corresponding to 351 U/ml of keratinase activity. Moreover, scaling up sequentially to 20 L bioreactors was implemented using constant impeller tip speed and constant mass transfer coefficient as key scale-up parameters. The keratinase activity in 5, 10 and 20 L bioreactors showed similar results with the one of shake flasks (412 U/ml) and 2 L bioreactors (351 U/ml)with respect to the keratinase activity values of 336, 385 and 344 U/ml, respectively. The results suggest keratinase production by evaluating chicken feathers in commercial level. Furthermore, this study has potential to contribute industrial scale production of keratinase by Streptomyces sp. 2M21 using the proposed bioreactor conditions.

Indexed as

BioreactorsBacterial ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesStreptomycesBacterial ProteinskeratinasePeptide HydrolasesAerationAgitationBioreactorsChicken feathersKeratinase production

Identifiers

PMID33754250
OpenAlexW3138751153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.