ArticleMycopathologia2021
Treatment Outcome with Fosravuconazole for Onychomycosis.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- New and Investigational Treatment Options for Dermatomycosis in the Era of Antifungal Resistance.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Azole Combinations and Multi-Targeting Drugs That Synergistically InhibitJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Risk factors for the development of tinea pedis and onychomycosis: Real-world evidence from a single-podiatry center, large-scale database in Japan.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Article
- Antifungal Selection for the Treatment of Onychomycosis: Patient Considerations and Outcomes.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Review
- Dermatophytomas: Clinical Overview and Treatment.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Mycetoma: Development of Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fosravuconazole L-lysine ethanolate (F-RVCZ), a ravuconazole prodrug, is a newly available agent with high expectations for efficacy in the treatment of onychomycosis. However, clinical data regarding the efficacy of F-RVCZ are limited because the drug was launched only in Japan in 2018. Therefore, we analyzed the outcome of F-RVCZ therapy in the treatment of onychomycosis at outpatient dermatology clinics in Japan. We examined data for 109 patients (68 male, 41 female) with varying clinical type, including total dystrophic onychomycosis and dermatophytoma, and a wide range of age groups, including the elderly. The complete cure rate at 12 weeks was 6.4% (7/109) and 67.9% (74/109) at the last visit (mean time to last visit: 32 ± 14.2 weeks). Mean rate of improvement in the affected nail area was 49.1 ± 23.3% at 12 weeks and 86.8 ± 22.4% at the last visit. Efficacy at 12 weeks and the last visit, respectively, was as follows: none, 4 cases and 1 case; slight, 35 cases and 4 cases; moderate, 51 cases and 21 cases; significant, 12 cases and 9 cases; complete cure, 7 cases and 74 cases. There were no serious adverse events. This retrospective survey was the first large-scale analysis of actual clinical practice outcomes and had minimal exclusions. Compared to previous reports, our results demonstrated excellent efficacy of F-RVCZ therapy in a variety of patients. Considering our results and the ease of oral administration (1 capsule/day for 12 weeks) and few adverse events, F-RVCZ therapy appears to be a useful option for the treatment of onychomycosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.