Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33754182›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Temporal context effects are associated with cognitive status in advanced age.

Sarah Maaß, Thomas Wolbers, Hedderik van Rijn, Martin Riemer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Space-time interference in action.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rapid calibration to dynamic temporal contexts.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The effect of aging and emotions on time processing.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah MaaßDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712-TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8122-6604
Thomas WolbersAging and Cognition Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2943-8949
Hedderik van RijnDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712-TS, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0461-9850
Martin RiemerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712-TS, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.riemer@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-4204
University of Groningen · NLGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 411006663Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 453-16-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of temporal intervals changes during the life-span, and especially older adults demonstrate specific impairments of timing abilities. Recently, we demonstrated that timing performance and cognitive status are correlated in older adults, suggesting that timing tasks can serve as a behavioral marker for the development of dementia. Easy-to-administer and retest-capable timing tasks therefore have potential as diagnostic tools for tracking cognitive decline. However, before being tested in a clinical cohort study, a further validation and specification of the original findings is warranted. Here we introduce several modifications of the original task and investigated the effects of temporal context on time perception in older adults (> 65 years) with low versus high scores in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment survey (MoCA) and a test of memory functioning. In line with our previous work, we found that temporal context effects were more pronounced with increasing memory deficits, but also that these effects are stronger for realistic compared to abstract visual stimuli. Furthermore, we show that two distinct temporal contexts influence timing behavior in separate experimental blocks, as well as in a mixed block in which both contexts are presented together. These results replicate and extend our previous findings. They demonstrate the stability of the effect for different stimulus material and show that timing tasks can reveal valuable information about the cognitive status of older adults. In the future, these findings could serve as a basis for the development of a diagnostic tool for pathological cognitive decline at an early, pre-clinical stage.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionTime PerceptionAgedCognitionCohort StudiesHumansMemory DisordersNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID33754182
PMCPMC8885470
OpenAlexW3136684119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.