ArticleCureus2021
Non-Invasive Predictors of Response to Tamsulosin for Benign Prostatic Obstruction.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Green enrichment of α-terpineol from niaouli oil residueRSC advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives To identify non-invasive predictors of response to tamsulosin 0.4 mg in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Methods Males ≥ 50 years of age with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of BPO for over three months were included in the study. We assessed change in the mean International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum flow rate (Qmax) after six weeks of medical therapy. Clinical and uroflowmetry parameters were compared between two groups of patients with >25% vs. <25% change in the IPSS after treatment. Pre- and post-treatment post-void residue (PVR), Qmax, and IPSS were compared by independent t-test, univariate/multivariate regression analysis. Results A total of 121 patients were included. At presentation, the mean prostate size was 35.7±12.2 grams and the mean IPSS was 16.3 ± 4.8. Improvement in the mean IPSS was 7.83, with more marked improvement in storage compared to voiding LUTS (5.26 vs. 2.57). Majority (58%) had a quality of life (QoL) score of 4-5 at presentation whereas after 6-weeks of medication (83.5%) had a QoL score of 0-2. Treatment failure was noted in 11 (9.1%) patients. IPSS was higher and Qmax was lower at the time of presentation in patients who had <25% improvement. However, the two groups were identical on the basis of demographic and other factors (BMI, age, prostate size, PVR). Conclusion Moderate LUTS secondary to BPO responds favourably to alpha-blocker (tamsulosin 0.4 mg) treatment. Uroflowmetry (UFM) parameters, that is, Qmax and IPSS are important factors in predicting short-term response to medical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.