ArticleVirus evolution2021
The evolutionary history of ACE2 usage within the coronavirus subgenus
Article in Virus evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Breadth of ACE2 receptor usage predicts host range and antigenic relatedness across bat sarbecoviruses.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Targeting of conserved spike epitopes enables broad antibody neutralisation of diverse bat sarbecoviruses.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Novel AfricanJournal of virology · 2026Article
- Clade-3 Bat Sarbecovirus PRD0038 Reveals Constraints on Coronavirus Emergence and Immune Sensitivity.Research square · 2026Article
- COVID-19 vaccination induces cross-neutralisation of sarbecoviruses related to SARS-CoV-2.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Review
- Structural basis for sarbecovirus Rc-o319 spike adaptation to Rhinolophus cornutus Bat ACE2 and constraints on switching to human ACE2.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- RAISE: A computational tool for evaluating sarbecovirus spillover potential.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Systematic multi-reference vertebrate ACE2 sequence similarity analysis predicts species susceptibility to SARS-related sarbecoviruses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental evolution of Rc-o319 sarbecovirus spike protein reveals limited ACE2 adaptability.Virus evolution · 2026Article
- Characterization and immunogenicity of nanoparticle vaccines based on Clade 2 and Clade 3 sarbecovirus S2 proteins.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- Complete genome sequence analysis of Sarbecovirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronaviruses) from Zimbabwean insectivorous bats.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Design of SARS-CoV-2 RBD immunogens to focus immune responses toward conserved coronavirus epitopes.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- The recency and geographical origins of the bat viruses ancestral to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.Cell · 2025Article
- SARS-related coronavirus S-protein structures reveal synergistic RBM interactions underpinning high-affinity human ACE2 binding.Science advances · 2025Article
- Review
- The Batalogue: an overview of betacoronaviruses with future pandemic potential.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Genome data artifacts and functional studies of deletion repair in the BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.Virus evolution · 2025Article
- Biosurveillance of coronaviruses inVirus evolution · 2025Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and SARS-CoV-2 are not phylogenetically closely related; however, both use the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in humans for cell entry. This is not a universal sarbecovirus trait; for example, many known sarbecoviruses related to SARS-CoV-1 have two deletions in the receptor binding domain of the spike protein that render them incapable of using human ACE2. Here, we report three sequences of a novel sarbecovirus from Rwanda and Uganda that are phylogenetically intermediate to SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrate via in vitro studies that they are also unable to utilize human ACE2. Furthermore, we show that the observed pattern of ACE2 usage among sarbecoviruses is best explained by recombination not of SARS-CoV-2, but of SARS-CoV-1 and its relatives. We show that the lineage that includes SARS-CoV-2 is most likely the ancestral ACE2-using lineage, and that recombination with at least one virus from this group conferred ACE2 usage to the lineage including SARS-CoV-1 at some time in the past. We argue that alternative scenarios such as convergent evolution are much less parsimonious; we show that biogeography and patterns of host tropism support the plausibility of a recombination scenario, and we propose a competitive release hypothesis to explain how this recombination event could have occurred and why it is evolutionarily advantageous. The findings provide important insights into the natural history of ACE2 usage for both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and a greater understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms that shape zoonotic potential of coronaviruses. This study also underscores the need for increased surveillance for sarbecoviruses in southwestern China, where most ACE2-using viruses have been found to date, as well as other regions such as Africa, where these viruses have only recently been discovered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.