Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33753850›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Visualizing the ribonucleoprotein content of single bunyavirus virions reveals more efficient genome packaging in the arthropod host.

Erick Bermúdez-Méndez, Eugene A Katrukha, Cindy M Spruit, Jeroen Kortekaas, Paul J Wichgers Schreur

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Remodelling of P-bodies and the cytoskeleton byThe Journal of general virology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The genome of a bunyavirus cannot be defined at the level of the viral particle but only at the scale of the viral population.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Virus Is a Community: Diversity within Negative-Sense RNA Virus Populations.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erick Bermúdez-MéndezDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-7898
Eugene A KatrukhaCell Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9971-3603
Cindy M SpruitDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Jeroen KortekaasDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0329-0176
Paul J Wichgers SchreurDepartment of Virology, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands. paul.wichgersschreur@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-2438
Wageningen University & Research · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bunyaviruses have a genome that is divided over multiple segments. Genome segmentation complicates the generation of progeny virus, since each newly formed virus particle should preferably contain a full set of genome segments in order to disseminate efficiently within and between hosts. Here, we combine immunofluorescence and fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to simultaneously visualize bunyavirus progeny virions and their genomic content at single-molecule resolution in the context of singly infected cells. Using Rift Valley fever virus and Schmallenberg virus as prototype tri-segmented bunyaviruses, we show that bunyavirus genome packaging is influenced by the intracellular viral genome content of individual cells, which results in greatly variable packaging efficiencies within a cell population. We further show that bunyavirus genome packaging is more efficient in insect cells compared to mammalian cells and provide new insights on the possibility that incomplete particles may contribute to bunyavirus spread as well.

Indexed as

Viral Genome PackagingAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsFluorescent Antibody TechniqueInsectaIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOrthobunyavirusRibonucleoproteinsRift Valley fever virusVero CellsViral ProteinsVirionRibonucleoproteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33753850
PMCPMC7985392
OpenAlexW3138693239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.