Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33753830›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Monitoring the variation in the gut microbiota of captive woolly monkeys related to changes in diet during a reintroduction process.

Camilo Quiroga-González, Luis Alberto Chica Cardenas, Mónica Ramírez, Alejandro Reyes, Camila González, Pablo R Stevenson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Assessment of Adaptation Status of ReintroducedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fecal bacterial communities of wild black capuchin monkeys (Current research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camilo Quiroga-GonzálezLaboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales y Primatología (LEBTYP), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia. ca.quiroga158@uniandes.edu.co.
Luis Alberto Chica CardenasGrupo de Investigación en Biología Computacional y Ecología Microbiana (BCEM), Max Planck Tandem Research Group in Computational Biology, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Mónica RamírezLaboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales y Primatología (LEBTYP), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alejandro ReyesGrupo de Investigación en Biología Computacional y Ecología Microbiana (BCEM), Max Planck Tandem Research Group in Computational Biology, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia. a.reyes@uniandes.edu.co.
Camila GonzálezCentro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Parasitología Tropical (CIMPAT), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Pablo R StevensonLaboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales y Primatología (LEBTYP), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Universidad de Los Andes · COWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiome is known to play an important role in the health of organisms and different factors such as diet have been associated with modifications in microbial communities. Differences in the microbiota composition of wild and captive animals has been evaluated; however, variation during a reintroduction process in primates has never been reported. Our aim was to identify changes in the bacterial composition of three individuals of reintroduced woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha) and the variables associated with such changes. Fecal samples were collected and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was sequenced to determine gut microbial composition and functionality. Individual samples from released individuals showed a higher microbial diversity after being released compared to before liberation, associated with changes in their diet. Beta diversity and functionality analysis showed separation of samples from released and captive conditions and the major factor of variation was the moment of liberation. This study shows that intestinal microbiota varies depending on site conditions and is mainly associated with diet diversity. The intake of food from wild origin by released primates may promote a positive effect on gut microbiota, improving health, and potentially increasing success in reintroduction processes.

Indexed as

DietAnimalsAtelinaeBacteriaEatingFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID33753830
PMCPMC7985493
OpenAlexW3137601242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.