Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33753790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Reduced scan time and superior image quality with 3D flow MRI compared to 4D flow MRI for hemodynamic evaluation of the Fontan pathway.

Friso M Rijnberg, Hans C van Assen, Joe F Juffermans, Lucia J M Kroft, Pieter J van den Boogaard, Patrick J H de Koning, Mark G Hazekamp, Séline F S van der Woude, Evangeline G Warmerdam, Tim Leiner and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Extracardiac conduit adequacy along the respiratory cycle in adolescent Fontan patients.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Hemodynamic Analysis of Cerebral AVMs with 3D Phase-Contrast MR Imaging.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Friso M RijnbergDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. f.m.rijnberg@lumc.nl.
Hans C van AssenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joe F JuffermansDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lucia J M KroftDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pieter J van den BoogaardDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Patrick J H de KoningDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mark G HazekampDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Séline F S van der WoudeDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Evangeline G WarmerdamDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tim LeinerDepartment of Radiology, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heynric B GrotenhuisDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelle J GoemanDepartment of Biostatistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hildo J LambDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arno A W RoestDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jos J M WestenbergDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long scan times prohibit a widespread clinical applicability of 4D flow MRI in Fontan patients. As pulsatility in the Fontan pathway is minimal during the cardiac cycle, acquiring non-ECG gated 3D flow MRI may result in a reduction of scan time while accurately obtaining time-averaged clinical parameters in comparison with 2D and 4D flow MRI. Thirty-two Fontan patients prospectively underwent 2D (reference), 3D and 4D flow MRI of the Fontan pathway. Multiple clinical parameters were assessed from time-averaged flow rates, including the right-to-left pulmonary flow distribution (main endpoint) and systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow (SPCF). A ten-fold reduction in scan time was achieved [4D flow 15.9 min (SD 2.7 min) and 3D flow 1.6 min (SD 7.8 s), p < 0.001] with a superior signal-to-noise ratio [mean ratio of SNRs 1.7 (0.8), p < 0.001] and vessel sharpness [mean ratio 1.2 (0.4), p = 0.01] with 3D flow. Compared to 2D flow, good-excellent agreement was shown for mean flow rates (ICC 0.82-0.96) and right-to-left pulmonary flow distribution (ICC 0.97). SPCF derived from 3D flow showed good agreement with that from 4D flow (ICC 0.86). 3D flow MRI allows for obtaining time-averaged flow rates and derived clinical parameters in the Fontan pathway with good-excellent agreement with 2D and 4D flow, but with a tenfold reduction in scan time and significantly improved image quality compared to 4D flow.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsAdolescentChildFemaleFontan ProcedureHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePostoperative ComplicationsSignal-To-Noise RatioYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33753790
PMCPMC7985309
OpenAlexW3139427381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.