Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33753745›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2021

The obesity paradox in early and advanced HER2 positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of clinical trial data.

Natansh D Modi, Jin Quan Eugene Tan, Andrew Rowland, Bogda Koczwara, Ahmad Y Abuhelwa, Ganessan Kichenadasse, Ross A McKinnon, Michael D Wiese, Michael J Sorich, Ashley M Hopkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Circulating Glypican 4 and mortality risk in patients with metastatic breast cancer-results from the DESIREE study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Natansh D ModiCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia. natansh.modi@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3262-5374
Jin Quan Eugene TanCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Andrew RowlandCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Bogda KoczwaraCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ahmad Y AbuhelwaCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-065X
Ganessan KichenadasseCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9923-5149
Ross A McKinnonCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Michael D WieseClinical and Health Sciences and Health and Biomedical Innovation, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Michael J SorichCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Ashley M HopkinsCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

National Breast Cancer Foundation (NBCF) PF17007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While many studies have evaluated the relationship between BMI and breast cancer outcomes, it is unclear whether this relationship is consistent between early breast cancer (BC) and advanced BC. The study included 5099 patients with HER2 positive early BC (EBC) and 3496 with HER2 positive advanced BC (ABC). In the EBC cohort, higher BMI was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR [95% CI]: overweight = 1.30 [1.13-1.51]; obese = 1.37 [1.14-1.64], P = < 0.001), and worse disease-free survival (overweight = 1.10 [0.98-1.24]; obese = 1.20 [1.04-1.39], P = 0.061). In contrast, for the ABC cohort, higher BMI was significantly associated with improved OS (overweight = 0.85 [0.76-0.96]; obese = 0.82 [0.72-0.95], P = 0.014), and progression-free survival (overweight = 0.91 [0.83-1.01]; obese = 0.87 [0.77-0.98], P = 0.034). In this large high-quality dataset, higher BMI was independently associated with worse survival in EBC, paradoxically in ABC higher BMI was independently associated with improved survival.

Identifiers

PMID33753745
PMCPMC7985140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.