Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33753568›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Higher postoperative plasma EV PD-L1 predicts poor survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Gaopeng Li, Guoliang Wang, Fenqing Chi, Yuqi Jia, Xi Wang, Quankai Mu, Keru Qin, Xiaoxia Zhu, Jing Pang, Baixue Xu and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PD-L1Biomarker research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The role of extracellular vesicle immune checkpoints in cancer.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2024
    Review
  12. Soluble PD-L1 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in resectable gastric cancer patients.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gaopeng Li *Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Guoliang Wang *Laboratory of Tumor and Immunology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health (NCCH), Beijing, China.
Fenqing ChiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Yuqi JiaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Xi WangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Quankai MuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Keru QinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Xiaoxia ZhuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Jing PangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Baixue XuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Guangen FengDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Yuhu NiuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Tao GongDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Haematology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Xiushan DongDepartment of General Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Ting LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Shanxi Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Jinfeng MaDepartment of General Surgery, Shanxi Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Zefeng GaoDepartment of General Surgery, Shanxi Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Kai TaoDepartment of Minimal Invasive Digestive Surgery, Shanxi Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Feng LiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Shanxi Cancer Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Jun XuDepartment of General Surgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China shanxiyangcheng@126.com junxuty@163.com.
Baofeng YuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shanxi Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Cell Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University) of Ministry of Education, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China shanxiyangcheng@126.com junxuty@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1262-2451
Shanxi Medical University · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe satisfactory prognostic indicator of gastric cancer (GC) patients after surgery is still lacking. Perioperative plasma extracellular vesicular programmed cell death ligand-1 (ePD-L1) has been demonstrated as a potential prognosis biomarker in many types of cancers. The prognostic value of postoperative plasma ePD-L1 has not been characterized.

methodsWe evaluated the prognostic value of preoperative, postoperative and change in plasma ePD-L1, as well as plasma soluble PD-L1, in short-term survival of GC patients after surgery. The Kaplan-Meier survival model and Cox proportional hazards models for both univariate and multivariate analyzes were used. And the comparison between postoperative ePD-L1 and conventional serum biomarkers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and CA72-4) in prognostic of GC patients was made.

resultsThe prognostic value of postoperative ePD-L1 is superior to that of preoperative ePD-L1 on GC patients after resection, and also superior to that of conventional serum biomarkers (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4). The levels of postoperative ePD-L1 and ePD-L1 change are independent prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence free survival of GC patients. High plasma level of postoperative ePD-L1 correlates significantly with poor survival, while high change in ePD-L1 level brings the significant survival benefit.

conclusionsThe level of plasma postoperative ePD-L1 could be considered as a candidate prognostic biomarker of GC patients after resection.

Indexed as

GastrectomyAgedAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayExtracellular VesiclesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCA-72-4 antigencarbohydrate antigen 199, humanCarcinoembryonic AntigenCD274 protein, humangastrointestinal neoplasmsimmune evation

Identifiers

PMID33753568
PMCPMC7986771
OpenAlexW3138561601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.