Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33753417›Full record

ArticleGut2022

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic treatment for Barrett's neoplasia with radiofrequency ablation ± endoscopic resection: results from the national Dutch database in a 10-year period.

Sanne van Munster, Esther Nieuwenhuis, Bas L A M Weusten, Lorenza Alvarez Herrero, Auke Bogte, Alaa Alkhalaf, B E Schenk, Erik J Schoon, Wouter Curvers, Arjun D Koch and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. [Establishment of a database for liver cancer ablation and its clinical research value].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Reasons for fear of cancer recurrence after endoscopic treatment of T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. A semi-structured interview study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Sanne van MunsterGastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.
Esther NieuwenhuisGastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.
Bas L A M WeustenGastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Lorenza Alvarez HerreroGastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Auke BogteGastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alaa AlkhalafGastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, Overijssel, The Netherlands.
B E SchenkGastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, Overijssel, The Netherlands.
Erik J SchoonDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Wouter CurversDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Arjun D KochGastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Steffi Elisabeth Maria van de VenGastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-0957
Pieter Jan Floris de JongeGastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tjon J TangDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Wouter B NagengastDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frans T M PetersDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jessie WesterhofDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Martin H M G HoubenGastroenterology and Hepatology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
Jacques Jghm BergmanGastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands j.j.bergman@amc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2283-5098
Roos E PouwGastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4707-1186
Dutch Barrett Expert Centers
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLIsala · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLHaga Hospital · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRadiofrequency ablation (RFA)±endoscopic resection (ER) is the preferred treatment for early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus (BE). We aimed to report short-term and long-term outcomes for all 1384 patients treated in the Netherlands (NL) from 2008 to 2018, with uniform treatment and follow-up (FU) in a centralised setting.

designEndoscopic therapy for early BE neoplasia in NL is centralised in nine expert centres with specifically trained endoscopists and pathologists that adhere to a joint protocol. Prospectively collected data are registered in a uniform database. Patients with low/high-grade dysplasia or low-risk cancer, were treated by ER of visible lesions followed by trimonthly RFA sessions of any residual BE until complete eradication of BE (CE-BE). Patients with ER alone were not included.

resultsAfter ER (62% of cases; 43% low-risk cancers) and median 1 circumferential and 2 focal RFA (p25-p75 0-1; 1-2) per patient, CE-BE was achieved in 94% (1270/1348). Adverse events occurred in 21% (268/1386), most commonly oesophageal stenosis (15%), all were managed endoscopically. A total of 1154 patients with CE-BE were analysed for long-term outcomes. During median 43 months (22-69) and 4 endoscopies (1-5), 38 patients developed dysplastic recurrence (3%, annual recurrence risk 1%), all were detected as endoscopically visible abnormalities. Random biopsies from a normal appearing cardia showed intestinal metaplasia (IM) in 14% and neoplasia in 0%. A finding of IM in the cardia was reproduced during further FU in only 33%, none progressed to neoplasia. Frequent FU visits in the first year of FU were not associated with recurrence risk.

conclusionIn a setting of centralised care, RFA±ER is effective for eradication of Barrett's related neoplasia and has remarkably low rates of dysplastic recurrence. Our data support more lenient FU intervals, with emphasis on careful endoscopic inspection. Random biopsies from neosquamous epithelium and cardia are of questionable value. NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER: NL7039.

Indexed as

EsophagoscopyRadiofrequency AblationAgedBarrett EsophagusCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRecurrenceTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBarrett's carcinomaBarrett's oesophagusendoscopic procedures

Identifiers

PMID33753417
PMCPMC8762001
OpenAlexW3137697691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.