ArticleContemporary clinical trials2021
A study design for statistical learning technique to predict radiological progression with an application of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using chest CT images.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of FAPI PET Uptake with Immunohistochemistry in Explanted Lungs from Patients with Advanced Interstitial Lung Disease.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Trial
- Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Fibrosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Review
- The potential of semi-quantitative and quantitative methods in predicting progression in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Observational
- Automated quantification system predicts survival in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- The applications of CT with artificial intelligence in the prognostic model of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal interstitial lung disease characterized by an unpredictable decline in lung function. Predicting IPF progression from the early changes in lung function tests have known to be a challenge due to acute exacerbation. Although it is unpredictable, the neighboring regions of fibrotic reticulation increase during IPF's progression. With this clinical information, quantitative characteristics of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and a statistical learning paradigm, the aim is to build a model to predict IPF progression.
designA paired set of anonymized 193 HRCT images from IPF subjects with 6-12 month intervals were collected retrospectively. The study was conducted in two parts: (1) Part A collects the ground truth in small regions of interest (ROIs) with labels of "expected to progress" or "expected to be stable" at baseline HRCT and develop a statistical learning model to classify voxels in the ROIs. (2) Part B uses the voxel-level classifier from Part A to produce whole-lung level scores of a single-scan total probability's (STP) baseline.
methodsUsing annotated ROIs from 71 subjects' HRCT scans in Part A, we applied Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization-Random Forest (QPSO-RF) to build the classifier. Then, 122 subjects' HRCT scans were used to test the prediction. Using Spearman rank correlations and survival analyses, we ascertained STP associations with 6-12 month changes in quantitative lung fibrosis and forced vital capacity.
conclusionThis study can serve as a reference for collecting ground truth, and developing statistical learning techniques to predict progression in medical imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.