ReviewSystematic reviews2021
Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review.
Review in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The renewed Development Model for Integrated Care: a systematic review and model update.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Article
- "It's the biggest not one-size-fits-all service I've ever worked in": the realities of delivering a 'Complications of Excess Weight' service for children and young people in England from a multidisciplinary team perspective.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- New policies, old habits: why and how Dutch mental healthcare moves towards collaboration.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Article
- Interorganizational Mechanisms for Developing and Implementing Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: Exploratory, Qualitative Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- "We Get Stuck in our Own Little Bubbles": How Community Mental Healthcare Professionals Acknowledge their Role in Interorganizational Collaboration.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Practices and outcomes of multidisciplinary collaboration to support the integration of healthcare into the daily lives of technology-dependent children.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2026Article
- Early activity and impact of a neighbourhood multidisciplinary team that integrates health and social support for underserved children and young people in Birmingham, UK: an observational study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Observational
- Collaborating Across Organizational Boundaries to Develop, Evaluate, and Implement eHealth: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- LinkingLearning health systems · 2025Article
- Who presents the greatest challenge in intellectual disability research- participants or health and research professionals?PloS one · 2025Article
- Vital lessons from struggling partnerships and potential partnerships: an international study with leaders across the health sector.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Motivators and mechanisms for an international rural health collaboration.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Physical activity policies in Saudi Arabia and Oman: a qualitative study using stakeholder interviews.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- 'The Norm Is to Not Openly Collaborate': Using the Lens of Co-Production to Evaluate the Development of a COVID-19 ICU Triage Policy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Advisory groups in realist reviews: Systematically mapping current research and recommendations for practice.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2024Review
- Trust-building in temporary public health partnerships: a qualitative study of the partnership formation process of a Covid-19 test, trace and protect service.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInter-organisational collaboration is increasingly prominent within contemporary healthcare systems. A range of collaboration types such as alliances, networks, and mergers have been proposed as a means to turnaround organisations, by reducing duplication of effort, enabling resource sharing, and promoting innovations. However, in practice, due to the complexity of the process, such efforts are often rife with difficulty. Notable contributions have sought to make sense of this area; however, further understanding is needed in order to gain a better understanding of why some inter-organisational collaborations work when others do not, to be able to more effectively implement collaborations in the future.
methodsRealist review methodology was used with the intention of formulating context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to explain how inter-organisational collaborations work and why, combining systematic and purposive literature search techniques. The systematic review encompassed searches for reviews, commentaries, opinion pieces, and case studies on HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Social Policy and Practice databases, and further searches were conducted using Google Scholar. Data were extracted from included studies according to relevance to the realist review.
resultsFifty-three papers were included, informing the development of programme theories of how, why, and when inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work. Formulation of our programme theories incorporated the concepts of partnership synergy and collaborative inertia and found that it was essential to consider mechanisms underlying partnership functioning, such as building trust and faith in the collaboration to maximise synergy and thus collaborative performance. More integrative or mandated collaboration may lean more heavily on contract to drive collaborative behaviour.
conclusionAs the first realist review of inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare as an intervention for improvement, this review provides actionable evidence for policymakers and implementers, enhancing understanding of mechanisms underlying the functioning and performing of inter-organisational collaborations, as well as how to configure the context to aid success. Next steps in this research will test the results against further case studies and primary data to produce a further refined theory. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019149009.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.