Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33752754›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Direct impact of commonly used dietary emulsifiers on human gut microbiota.

Sabrine Naimi, Emilie Viennois, Andrew T Gewirtz, Benoit Chassaing

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 257 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Gut microbes · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrine NaimiINSERM U1016, team "Mucosal microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases", CNRS UMR 8104, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Emilie ViennoisINSERM, U1149, Center of Research on Inflammation, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Andrew T GewirtzInstitute for Biomedical Sciences, Center for Inflammation, Immunity and Infection, Digestive Disease Research Group, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Benoit ChassaingINSERM U1016, team "Mucosal microbiota in chronic inflammatory diseases", CNRS UMR 8104, Université de Paris, Paris, France. benoit.chassaing@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4285-769X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGeorgia State University · USInserm · FR

Funding

Pathophysiology of TLR5KO ColitisR01DK083890 · NIDDK · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GEWIRTZ, ANDREW T · 2010 to 2023
$5.0M
DECONSTRUCTING INFLAMMATION AND ALTERED MICROBIOTA IN METABOLIC SYNDROMER01DK099071 · NIDDK · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GEWIRTZ, ANDREW T · 2013 to 2024
$4.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083890NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiologic evidence and animal studies implicate dietary emulsifiers in contributing to the increased prevalence of diseases associated with intestinal inflammation, including inflammatory bowel diseases and metabolic syndrome. Two synthetic emulsifiers in particular, carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate 80, profoundly impact intestinal microbiota in a manner that promotes gut inflammation and associated disease states. In contrast, the extent to which other food additives with emulsifying properties might impact intestinal microbiota composition and function is not yet known.

methodsTo help fill this knowledge gap, we examined here the extent to which a human microbiota, maintained ex vivo in the MiniBioReactor Array model, was impacted by 20 different commonly used dietary emulsifiers. Microbiota density, composition, gene expression, and pro-inflammatory potential (bioactive lipopolysaccharide and flagellin) were measured daily.

resultsIn accordance with previous studies, both carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate 80 induced a lasting seemingly detrimental impact on microbiota composition and function. While many of the other 18 additives tested had impacts of similar extent, some, such as lecithin, did not significantly impact microbiota in this model. Particularly stark detrimental impacts were observed in response to various carrageenans and gums, which altered microbiota density, composition, and expression of pro-inflammatory molecules.

conclusionsThese results indicate that numerous, but not all, commonly used emulsifiers can directly alter gut microbiota in a manner expected to promote intestinal inflammation. Moreover, these data suggest that clinical trials are needed to reduce the usage of the most detrimental compounds in favor of the use of emulsifying agents with no or low impact on the microbiota. Video abstract.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsDietEmulsifying AgentsFood AdditivesHumansInflammationEmulsifying AgentsFood AdditivesDietary emulsifierGut microbiotaIBDIntestinal inflammation

Identifiers

PMID33752754
PMCPMC7986288
OpenAlexW3139243481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.