Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33752683›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2021

Origin, behaviour, and genetics of reproductive workers in an invasive ant.

Pauline Lenancker, Heike Feldhaar, Anja Holzinger, Melinda Greenfield, Angela Strain, Peter Yeeles, Benjamin D Hoffmann, Wee Tek Tay, Lori Lach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Phenomenon of reproductive plasticity in ants.Current opinion in insect science · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pauline LenanckerCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia. Pauline.Lenancker@my.jcu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0532-2768
Heike FeldhaarAnimal Ecology I, Bayreuth Centre of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany.
Anja HolzingerAnimal Ecology I, Bayreuth Centre of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany.
Melinda GreenfieldCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
Angela StrainCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
Peter YeelesCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
Benjamin D HoffmannCSIRO, Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre, Darwin, NT, 0822, Australia.
Wee Tek TayCSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Lori LachCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, 4870, Australia.
James Cook University · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity of Bayreuth · DEEcosystem Sciences · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorker reproduction has an important influence on the social cohesion and efficiency of social insect colonies, but its role in the success of invasive ants has been neglected. We used observations of 233 captive colonies, laboratory experiments, and genetic analyses to investigate the conditions for worker reproduction in the invasive Anoplolepis gracilipes (yellow crazy ant) and its potential cost on interspecific defence. We determined the prevalence of worker production of males and whether it is triggered by queen absence; whether physogastric workers with enlarged abdomens are more likely to be reproductive, how normal workers and physogastric workers compare in their contributions to foraging and defence; and whether worker-produced males and males that could have been queen- or worker-produced differ in their size and heterozygosity.

resultsSixty-six of our 233 captive colonies produced males, and in 25 of these, some males could only have been produced by workers. Colonies with more workers were more likely to produce males, especially for queenless colonies. The average number of days between the first appearance of eggs and adult males in our colonies was 54.1 ± 10.2 (mean ± SD, n = 20). In our laboratory experiment, queen removal triggered an increase in the proportion of physogastric workers. Physogastric workers were more likely to have yolky oocytes (37-54.9%) than normal workers (2-25.6%), which is an indicator of fertile or trophic egg production. Physogastric workers were less aggressive during interspecific aggression tests and foraged less than normal workers. The head width and wing length of worker-produced males were on average 4.0 and 4.3% greater respectively than those of males of undetermined source. Our microsatellite DNA analyses indicate that 5.5% of worker-produced males and 14.3% of males of undetermined source were heterozygous, which suggests the presence of diploid males and/or genetic mosaics in A. gracilipes.

conclusionsOur experimental work provides crucial information on worker reproduction in A. gracilipes and its potential cost to colony defence. The ability of A. gracilipes workers to produce males in the absence of queens may also contribute to its success as an invasive species if intranidal mating can take place between virgin queens and worker-produced males.

Indexed as

Aggression testsAnoplolepis gracilipesEusocial insectsHaplodiploidHymenopteraOecophylla smaragdinaOocytesOvariesWorker conflictWorker reproduction

Identifiers

PMID33752683
PMCPMC7986258
OpenAlexW3107604197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.