Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33752608›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2021

Video as an alternative to in-person consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up: a qualitative study.

Cecilie Varsi, Aud-Eldrid Stenehjem, Elin Børøsund, Lise Solberg Nes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients With CKD: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The SElf-Care After REnal Transplantation Study: A Retrospective Evaluation of a Home-Monitoring Program Implemented as Standard Care.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  10. Telehealth Experience Among Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Mixed Methods Study.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Cecilie VarsiDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway. cecilie.varsi@usn.no.
Aud-Eldrid StenehjemDepartment of Nephrology, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Elin BørøsundDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Lise Solberg NesDepartment of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal transplant recipients have to see a nephrologist for regular follow-up for the rest of their lives. To reduce the burden for the patients, video consultation can be an alternative to traditional in-person hospital consultations. The aim of the current study was, from the perspectives of patients and health care providers, to investigate the perceived benefits and challenges of using video consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up.

methodsPatients (i.e., renal transplant recipients; n = 18) alternated between regular in-person follow-up consultations and video consultations. Patients and health care providers were then invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsPatients interviewed (n = 15) were median 53 years old (range 37-64) and 53% female. The video consultation solution used in the study turned out to have major technical deficiencies. Despite the technical challenges, however, the majority of the patients reported appreciating being able to alternate between video and in-person hospital consultations. Main benefits reported included not needing to travel to the hospital and thereby saving time, less focus on being chronically ill and potential economic benefits for patients and society. The health care providers (n = 3) also valued the benefits provided by the use of video consultations, but described the reoccurring technical challenges as disruptive. The fact that patients were in a stable phase of their health condition and already had an established, trusting relationship with their nephrologist, acted as facilitators for success. Possible challenges and harms described included concerns related to security, confidentiality and interruptions, as well as the potential need for physical examinations.

conclusionsBenefits from using video consultations as an alternative to in-person consultations may outweigh potential technological challenges for patients as well as health care providers. A long-lasting mutually trusting relationship between patient and provider may be an important prerequisite for the experienced benefits of using video consultation. Findings also indicate that starting such care delivery changes in a small-scale, with a few selected patients in a stable phase of their condition, may be an important factor for success.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationTelemedicineTransplant RecipientsAdultAftercareContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsQualitative ResearcheHealthHealth servicesKidney diseasesOrgan transplantationOutpatientsQualitative researchTelemedicineVideo consultation

Identifiers

PMID33752608
PMCPMC7983085
OpenAlexW3138576508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.