ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
Comparing de novo transcriptome assembly tools in di- and autotetraploid non-model plant species.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatics perspectives on transcriptomics: A comprehensive review of bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- De novo assembly of plasmodium interspersed repeat (pir) genes from Plasmodium vivax RNAseq data suggests geographic conservation of sub-family transcription.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- A first de novo transcriptome assembly of feijoa (Acca sellowiana [Berg] Burret) reveals key genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Uncovering the Role of Hydroxycinnamoyl Transferase in Boosting Chlorogenic Acid Accumulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Tissue-specific transcriptomes reveal potential mechanisms of microbiome heterogeneity in an ancient fish.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- Optimizing an efficient ensemble approach for high-quality de novo transcriptome assembly of Thymus daenensis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- De novo transcriptome assembly, gene annotation, and EST-SSR marker development of an important medicinal and edible crop, Amomum tsaoko (Zingiberaceae).BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Upcoming progress of transcriptomics studies on plants: An overview.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Isolation, Phylogenetic and Gephyromycin Metabolites Characterization of New Exopolysaccharides-Bearing Antarctic Actinobacterium from Feces of Emperor Penguin.Marine drugs · 2021Article
- Defense-Related Gene Expression Following an Orthotospovirus Infection Is Influenced by Host Resistance inViruses · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolyploidy is very common in plants and can be seen as one of the key drivers in the domestication of crops and the establishment of important agronomic traits. It can be the main source of genomic repatterning and introduces gene duplications, affecting gene expression and alternative splicing. Since fully sequenced genomes are not yet available for many plant species including crops, de novo transcriptome assembly is the basis to understand molecular and functional mechanisms. However, in complex polyploid plants, de novo transcriptome assembly is challenging, leading to increased rates of fused or redundant transcripts. Since assemblers were developed mainly for diploid organisms, they may not well suited for polyploids. Also, comparative evaluations of these tools on higher polyploid plants are extremely rare. Thus, our aim was to fill this gap and to provide a basic guideline for choosing the optimal de novo assembly strategy focusing on autotetraploids, as the scientific interest in this type of polyploidy is steadily increasing.
resultsWe present a comparison of two common (SOAPdenovo-Trans, Trinity) and one recently published transcriptome assembler (TransLiG) on diploid and autotetraploid species of the genera Acer and Vaccinium using Arabidopsis thaliana as a reference. The number of assembled transcripts was up to 11 and 14 times higher with an increased number of short transcripts for Acer and Vaccinium, respectively, compared to A. thaliana. In diploid samples, Trinity and TransLiG performed similarly good while in autotetraploids, TransLiG assembled most complete transcriptomes with an average of 1916 assembled BUSCOs vs. 1705 BUSCOs for Trinity. Of all three assemblers, SOAPdenovo-Trans performed worst (1133 complete BUSCOs).
conclusionAll three assembly tools produced complete assemblies when dealing with the model organism A. thaliana, independently of its ploidy level, but their performances differed extremely when it comes to non-model autotetraploids, where specifically TransLiG and Trinity produced a high number of redundant transcripts. The recently published assembler TransLiG has not been tested yet on any plant organism but showed highest completeness and full-length transcriptomes, especially in autotetraploids. Including such species during the development and testing of new assembly tools is highly appreciated and recommended as many important crops are polyploid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.