Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33752280›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2021

The baseline recurrence risk of patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer.

Yutaka Yoneoka, Mayumi Kobayashi Kato, Yasuhito Tanase, Masaya Uno, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Takashi Murakami, Tomoyasu Kato

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yutaka YoneokaDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayumi Kobayashi KatoDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhito TanaseDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaya UnoDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuya IshikawaDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi MurakamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
Tomoyasu KatoDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo National Hospital · JPShiga University of Medical Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the prognosis of patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer and to evaluate the necessity of adjuvant therapy.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with stage IB-II cervical cancer who underwent type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy between 2008 and 2017. In our institution, radical hysterectomy is performed as an open surgery and not as a minimally invasive surgery, and adjuvant therapy is not administered to patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer. The intermediate-risk group included patients with 2 or more of the following factors: tumor size >4 cm, stromal invasion >1/2, and lymphovascular stromal invasion. Intermediaterisk patients with squamous cell carcinoma were included in the I-SCC group, whereas those with endocervical adenocarcinoma, usual type, or adenosquamous carcinoma were included in the I-Adeno group.

resultsThere were 34 and 18 patients in the I-SCC and I-Adeno groups, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival rates in the I-SCC group were 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.3-95.7%) and 100% (95% CI, 100%), respectively, whereas those in the I-Adeno group were 54.9% (95% CI, 42.0-67.9%) and 76.1% (95% CI, 63.7-88.4%), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that endocervical adenocarcinoma, usual type, or adenosquamous carcinoma, and tumor size >4 cm had worse RFS.

conclusionThe I-SCC group had good prognosis without adjuvant therapy; therefore, adjuvant therapy may be omitted in these patients. In contrast, the I-Adeno group had poor prognosis without adjuvant therapy; therefore, adjuvant therapy should be considered in their treatment.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaRecurrenceSquamous cellsUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33752280
PMCPMC7991004
OpenAlexW3120761841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.