ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2021
Delay discounting and neurocognitive correlates among inner city adolescents with and without family history of substance use disorder.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intertemporal Decision-Making, Nucleus Accumbens Activation, and Alcohol Use Trajectories in Young Adults With a Family History of Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Article
- A large-scale dataset of choice and response-time data in intertemporal choice.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of environmental disadvantage on youth delayed reward discounting.Development and psychopathology · 2025Article
- Delay Discounting, Nucleus Accumbens Activation, and Alcohol Use Trajectories in Young Adults with a Family History of Alcohol Use Disorder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Environmental Support Moderates the association of Socioeconomic Distress and Delay Discounting across Adolescence.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2024Article
- Characteristics of Adolescents with and without a Family History of Substance Use Disorder from a Minority Cohort.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Addressing cortex dysregulation in youth through brain health check coaching and prophylactic brain development.INNOSC theranostics & pharmacological sciences · 2024Article
- Sex differences in stress responses among underrepresented minority adolescents at risk for substance use disorder.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2023Article
- Shapes of subcortical structures in adolescents with and without familial history of substance use disorder.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Hyperbolic discounting rates and risk for problematic alcohol use in youth enrolled in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development study.Addiction biology · 2022Article
- White matter integrity and functional connectivity in adolescents with a parental history of substance use disorder.Neuroimage. Reports · 2021Article
- Brain responses during delay discounting in youth at high-risk for substance use disorders.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Article
- A meta-analysis of neural systems underlying delay discounting: Implications for transdiagnostic research.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescents with a family history (FH+) of substance use disorder (SUD) are at a greater risk for SUD, suggested to be partly due to the transmission of behavioral impulsivity. We used a delay discounting task to compare impulsivity in decision-making and its associated brain functioning among FH+ and FH - minority adolescents. Participants chose between Smaller Sooner (SS) and Larger Later (LL) rewards. The SS was available immediately (Now trials) or in the future (Not-Now trials), allowing for greater differentiation between impulsive decisions. The FH+ group showed greater impatience by responding SS more frequently than the FH - group, only on the Now trials, and even when the relative reward differences (RRD) increased. Surprisingly, there were no differences in brain activity between the groups. Combined, the groups showed greater reward activity during the Now vs. Not-Now trials in medial prefrontal/anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, precuneus, and inferior frontal gyrus (i.e., an immediacy effect). As the RRD increased activation in the reward network decreased, including the striatum, possibly reflecting easy decision-making. These results indicate that risk for SUD, seen behaviorally among FH+ adolescents, may not yet be associated with discernable brain changes, suggesting that early intervention has the potential to reduce this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.