Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33751780›Full record

ReviewNeurogastroenterology and motility2021

Bisacodyl: A review of pharmacology and clinical evidence to guide use in clinical practice in patients with constipation.

Maura Corsetti, Sabine Landes, Robert Lange

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of glycerin on colonic motility in children.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Management of Chronic Constipation: A Comprehensive Review.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Maura CorsettiNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC),, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2957-4684
Sabine LandesConsumer Health Care, Medical Affairs - Digestive Health, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Robert LangeConsumer Health Care, Global Medical Affairs, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sanofi (France) · FRNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisacodyl is a member of the diphenylmethane family and is considered to be a stimulant laxative. It has a dual prokinetic and secretory action and needs to be converted into the active metabolite bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-pyridyl-2-methane (BHPM) in the gut to achieve the desired laxative effect. Bisacodyl acts locally in the large bowel by directly enhancing the motility, reducing transit time, and increasing the water content of the stool. A recent network meta-analysis concluded that bisacodyl showed similar efficacy to prucalopride, lubiprostone, linaclotide, tegaserod, velusetrag, elobixibat, and sodium picosulfate for the primary endpoint of ≥3 complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM)/week and an increase of ≥1 CSBM/week over baseline. The meta-analysis also found that bisacodyl may be superior to the other laxatives for the secondary endpoint of change from baseline in the number of spontaneous bowel movements per week in patients with chronic constipation. This observation stimulated the authors to review the available literature on bisacodyl, which has been available on the market since the 1950 s. PURPOSE: The aim of the current review was to provide an overview of the historic background, structure, function, and mechanism of action of bisacodyl. Additionally, we discuss the important features and studies for bisacodyl to understand its peculiar characteristics and guide its use in clinical practice, but also stimulate research on open questions.

Indexed as

BisacodylConstipationDefecationHumansIntestine, LargeLaxativesBisacodylLaxativesBisacodylconstipationlaxativemode of actionsecretagoguesodium picosulfate

Identifiers

PMID33751780
PMCPMC8596401
OpenAlexW3134268398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.