Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33751752›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Safety and Efficacy of Cetuximab-Based Salvage Chemotherapy After Checkpoint Inhibitors in Head and Neck Cancer.

Santiago Cabezas-Camarero, María Nieves Cabrera-Martín, Salomé Merino-Menéndez, Mateo Paz-Cabezas, Vanesa García-Barberán, Melchor Sáiz-Pardo Sanz, Maricruz Iglesias-Moreno, Almudena Alonso-Ovies, Pedro Pérez-Segura

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Santiago Cabezas-CamareroMedical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-7031
María Nieves Cabrera-Martín *Department Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Salomé Merino-Menéndez *Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Mateo Paz-CabezasMedical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Vanesa García-BarberánMedical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Melchor Sáiz-Pardo SanzDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Maricruz Iglesias-MorenoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Almudena Alonso-OviesDepartment of Craniomaxilofacial Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Pérez-SeguraMedical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are still few data on the activity and safety of cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after immunotherapy (SCAI) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients with SCCHN who received cetuximab-based SCAI after programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1(PD[L]1) inhibitors. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) with SCAI and with last chemotherapy before immunotherapy (LCBI) by RECIST 1.1, percentage change from baseline in target lesions (PCTL), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment compliance, and toxicity were evaluated.

resultsBetween March 2016 and November 2019, 23 patients were identified. SCAI consisted of cetuximab-based combinations (3-weekly cisplatin-5FU-cetuximab [n = 2], weekly paclitaxel-cetuximab [n = 17], weekly cisplatin-cetuximab [n = 2], weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-cetuximab [n = 2]). ORR was 56.5% (11 partial response, 2 complete response). DCR was 78.3%. Among 13 objective responders, median best PCTL was -53.5% (range, -30% to -100%). Median OS and PFS were 12 months and 6 months, respectively. In 10 patients receiving LCBI, ORR to LCBI was 40%, whereas ORR to SCAI achieved 60%. In LCBI-treated patients, median PFS with LCBI was 8 months and median PFS and OS with SCAI were 7 months and 12 months, respectively. Reduced dose intensity of the chemotherapy and cetuximab components occurred in 82.6% and 52.2% of the patients. Grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients. Grade 3 or 4 AEs developed in 65%, being grade 3 in all of them except in one patient (grade 4 neutropenia). There were no treatment-related deaths.

conclusionCetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after PD(L)1 inhibitors associated with high response rates and deep tumor reductions with a manageable safety profile. Subsequent lines of therapy may explain the long survival achieved in our series. These results invite to design studies to elucidate the best therapeutic sequence in patients with SCCHN in the immunotherapy era. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy (SCAI) achieved high response rates in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) after progression to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Objective response rate was higher than and progression-free survival was comparable to that of chemotherapy administered before immunotherapy (IO). In most patients, SCAI consisted of weekly, well-tolerated regimens. These observations have implications for current practice because of the limited evidence to date in SCCHN and the scant therapeutic options in this disease and invite to elucidate which may be the best treatment sequence for patients with head and neck cancer in the IO era.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHead and Neck NeoplasmsCetuximabHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesCetuximabCetuximabHead and neck cancerImmunotherapyPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitorsSalvage chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33751752
PMCPMC8176971
OpenAlexW3133737650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.