ArticleUpdates in surgery2021
Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients with acute cholecystitis: efficacy, safety and feasibility. Multicenter randomized control study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Modified Enhanced Recovery Program in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Prospective Randomized Trial
The Impact of ERAS-Based Multimodal Pain Management on Clinical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Ambispective Cohort Study
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols following emergency intra-abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathways in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With and Without Common Bile Duct Exploration: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of Adding Local Anesthesia to General Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Pain Management After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Enhanced perioperative care in emergency general surgery: the WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2023Review
- Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols reduces opioid use in pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Review
- The "Dark Side" of Pneumoperitoneum and Laparoscopy.Minimally invasive surgery · 2021Review
- Physiological and Anesthetic Considerations of Safe and Optimal Pneumoperitoneal Pressures for Laparoscopic Surgeries in Children.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgical procedure in acute cholecystitis (AC). Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs in-hospital stay. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve outcomes of emergency LC. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LC in patients with AC. A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized non-blinded clinical trial (NCT03754751). The mERAS group consisted of 88 patients the control group of 101 patients. The modified protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; PONV prophylaxis, early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS). The postoperative length of stay in the mERAS group was shorter (24 (21-45.5) h) than in the control (45 (41-68) h) (p < 0.0001). One re-admission in the mERAS group was reported (p = 0.466). There difference in complications was insignificant (mERAS 6.8% vs 5% p = 0.757). Post-operative pain intensity was significantly lower in the mERAS group immediately after awaking (3.7 ± 1.8 vs 5.4 ± 1.3 p < 0.0001), 2 h (3.3 ± 1.7 vs 4.9 ± 1.6 p = 0.0006), 6 h (2.9 ± 1.5 vs 4.2 ± 1.2 p < 0.0001), 12 h (2.7 ± 0.9 vs 4.1 ± 1.2 p = 0.0001) and 24 h after surgery (2.1 ± 1.2 vs 3 ± 1.2 p < 0.0001). The incidence of shoulder and neck pain was lower in mERAS group (13.6% vs 34.7% p = 0.0009). Peristalsis recovery was similar in both groups. The proposed protocol improved postoperative recovery and reduced hospital stay in patients with AC without increasing the rate of complications or re-admissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.