Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33751389›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2021

Physiological Responses to In-Bed Cycle Ergometry Treatment in Intensive Care Unit Patients with External Ventricular Drainage.

Elizabeth K Zink, Sowmya Kumble, Meghan Beier, Pravin George, Robert D Stevens, Mona N Bahouth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Effects ofNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Nonpharmacological Treatments for Hospitalized Patients with Stroke: A Nuanced Approach to Prescribing Early Activity.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth K ZinkDepartment of Neurosciences Nursing, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans Street, Zayed 3 West, Room 3074, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. ezink1@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6173-2764
Sowmya KumbleDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Meghan BeierDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pravin GeorgeCerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Robert D StevensDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mona N BahouthDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence suggests that early physical activity can be accomplished safely in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU); however, many NCCU patients are often maintained in a state of inactivity due to impaired consciousness, sensorimotor deficits, and concerns for intracranial pressure elevation or cerebral hypoperfusion in the setting of autoregulatory failure. Structured in-bed mobility interventions have been proposed to prevent sequelae of complete immobility in such patients, yet the feasibility and safety of these interventions is unknown. We studied neurological and hemodynamic changes before and after cycle ergometry (CE) in a subset of NCCU patients with external ventricular drains (EVDs).

methodsPatients admitted to the NCCU who had an EVD placed for cerebrospinal fluid drainage and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring underwent supine CE therapy with passive and active cycling settings. Neurologic status, ICP and hemodynamic parameters were monitored before and after each CE session.

resultsTwenty-seven patients successfully underwent in-bed CE in the NCCU. No clinically significant changes were recorded in neurologic or in physiological parameters before or after CE. There were no device dislodgements or other adverse effects requiring cessation of a CE session.

conclusionThese data suggest that supine CE in a heterogeneous cohort of neurocritical care patients with EVDs is safe and tolerable. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy and optimal dose and timing of supine CE in neurocritical care patients.

Indexed as

Critical CareIntracranial PressureDrainageErgometryHumansIntensive Care UnitsEarly mobilityErgometryExternal ventricular drainNeurocritical careRecoverySupine cycling

Identifiers

PMID33751389
PMCPMC7983346
OpenAlexW3139390049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.