Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33751295›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Patients Older 65 Years With Early Breast Cancer Prefer Intraoperative Radiation as a Locoregional Treatment Choice.

Annie Tang, Caitlin M Cohan, Genna Beattie, Elizabeth L Cureton, Jonathan D Svahn, Liisa L Lyon, Jason F Kelly, Veronica C Shim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The evolution of targeted intra operative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Annie TangDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Bay, Oakland, CA, USA.
Caitlin M CohanDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Bay, Oakland, CA, USA.
Genna BeattieDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Bay, Oakland, CA, USA.
Elizabeth L CuretonDepartment of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, East Bay, Oakland, CA, 95611, USA.
Jonathan D SvahnDepartment of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, East Bay, Oakland, CA, 95611, USA.
Liisa L LyonThe Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, CA, 94611, USA.
Jason F KellyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, East Bay, Oakland, CA, USA.
Veronica C ShimDepartment of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, East Bay, Oakland, CA, 95611, USA. veronica.shim@kp.org.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USCalifornia State University, East Bay · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients 65 years old or older with early endocrine-responsive breast cancer have many treatment options, including no radiation. This study aimed to evaluate treatment preference when intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is offered in this population.

methodsThe study reviewed patients 65 years old or older with a diagnosis of early-stage endocrine-responsive breast cancer in 2016-2019 at a single hospital in a large integrated health care system. Electronic medical records of multidisciplinary breast tumor board discussion, treatment options documented by the treatment team, and final treatment offered were reviewed. Variables including age at biopsy, language, endocrine treatment, and comorbidities were collected. Regression analysis was used to evaluate for variables associated with patients' choice regarding radiation treatment.

resultsThe institutional IORT guidelines were met by 63 patients in the described age group who had a documented offer of all radiation treatment options. The median age of the patients was 70 years (interquartile range 63-77 years). Overall, 74.6% of the patients chose IORT, and 14.3% opted for whole-breast irradiation. Only 4.8% chose to omit radiation after breast-conserving surgery, and 6.3% chose mastectomy. The patients who chose IORT were more likely to receive endocrine treatment (odds ratio 3.70; p = 0.03). Age, race, language, and comorbidities were not associated with preference for IORT (p < 0.05).

conclusionsPatients 65 years old or older with early-stage endocrine-responsive breast cancer preferred to have IORT despite counsel about the lack of survival benefit. This study suggests that local cancer control with the convenient radiation delivery method is important to the described patient population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy, Adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID33751295
OpenAlexW3134305234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.