Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33751281›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2021

The development and deployment of a model for hospital-level COVID-19 associated patient demand intervals from consistent estimators (DICE).

Linying Yang, Teng Zhang, Peter Glynn, David Scheinker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linying YangInstitute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. yanglinying1024@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7437-9269
Teng ZhangDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Peter GlynnDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
David ScheinkerDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5885-8024
Stanford University · USInstitute of Mathematical Statistics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospitals commonly project demand for their services by combining their historical share of regional demand with forecasts of total regional demand. Hospital-specific forecasts of demand that provide prediction intervals, rather than point estimates, may facilitate better managerial decisions, especially when demand overage and underage are associated with high, asymmetric costs. Regional point forecasts of patient demand are commonly available, e.g., for the number of people requiring hospitalization due to an epidemic such as COVID-19. However, even in this common setting, no probabilistic, consistent, computationally tractable forecast is available for the fraction of patients in a region that a particular institution should expect. We introduce such a forecast, DICE (Demand Intervals from Consistent Estimators). We describe its development and deployment at an academic medical center in California during the 'second wave' of COVID-19 in the Unite States. We show that DICE is consistent under mild assumptions and suitable for use with perfect, biased and unbiased regional forecasts. We evaluate its performance on empirical data from a large academic medical center as well as on synthetic data.

Indexed as

COVID-19AlgorithmsForecastingHealth Services Needs and DemandHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsModels, StatisticalSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Hospital-level forecastMoment methodParametric bootstrapPrediction biasPrediction interval

Identifiers

PMID33751281
PMCPMC7983102
OpenAlexW3137254207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.