Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33751262›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

A critical review on geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol in water: sources, effects, detection, and removal techniques.

S Mustapha, J O Tijani, M M Ndamitso, A S Abdulkareem, D T Shuaib, A K Mohammed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Influence of Temperature Regimes on the Production of 2-MIB and Geosmin by Pseudanabaena galeata and Phormidium ambiguum.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Geosmin Events Associated withMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Removal and Oxidation of Low ConcentrationACS ES&T engineering · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S MustaphaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Bosso Campus, PMB 65, Minna, Nigeria. saheedmustapha09@gmail.com.
J O TijaniDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Bosso Campus, PMB 65, Minna, Nigeria.
M M NdamitsoDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Technology, Bosso Campus, PMB 65, Minna, Nigeria.
A S AbdulkareemDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Gidan Kwano Campus, PMB 65, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria.
D T ShuaibDepartment of Chemistry, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3101 S Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL, 60616, USA.
A K MohammedDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, North Carolina Central University, 1801 Fayetteville Street, NC, 27707, Durham, USA.
Federal University of Technology Minna · NGIllinois Institute of Technology · USNorth Carolina Central University · US

Funding

Tertiary Education Trust Fund TETFUND/FUTMINNA/2017/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exposure to geosmin (GSM) and 2-methylisoborneol (2-MIB) in water has caused a negative impact on product reputation and customer distrust. The occurrence of these compounds and their metabolites during drinking water treatment processes has caused different health challenges. Conventional treatment techniques such as coagulation, sedimentation, filtration, and chlorination employed in removing these two commonest taste and odor compounds (GSM and 2-MIB) were found to be ineffective and inherent shortcomings. The removal of GSM and MIB were found to be effective using combination of activated carbon and ozonation; however, high treatment cost associated with ozonation technique and poor regeneration efficiency of activated carbon constitute serious setback to the combined system. Other shortcoming of the activated carbon adsorption and ozonation include low adsorption efficiency due to the presence of natural organic matter and humic acid. In light of this background, the review is focused on the sources, effects, environmental pathways, detection, and removal techniques of 2-MIB and GSM from aqueous media. Although advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) were found to be promising to remove the two compounds from water but accompanied with different challenges. Herein, to fill the knowledge gap analysis on these algal metabolites (GSM and 2-MIB), the integration of treatment processes vis-a-viz combination of one or more AOPs with other conventional methods are considered logical to remove these odorous compounds and hence could improve overall water quality.

Indexed as

Water Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationCamphanesEnvironmental MonitoringNaphtholsOdorantsWater2-methylisoborneolCamphanesgeosminNaphtholsWaterWater Pollutants, Chemical2-MethylisoborneolAdvanced oxidation processesConventional treatment techniquesGeosminWater quality

Identifiers

PMID33751262
OpenAlexW3139195020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.