Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33751096›Full record

ReviewThe Plant cell2021

Polyploidy: an evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times.

Yves Van de Peer, Tia-Lynn Ashman, Pamela S Soltis, Douglas E Soltis

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 349 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
349citing papers in PubMed
79.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

349 citing papers in PubMed, 701 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Orchid genome evolution and trait innovation.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

289 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Yves Van de PeerDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, VIB - UGent Center for Plant Systems Biology, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Tia-Lynn AshmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611.
Douglas E SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611.
Florida Museum of Natural History · USNanjing Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidy has been hypothesized to be both an evolutionary dead-end and a source for evolutionary innovation and species diversification. Although polyploid organisms, especially plants, abound, the apparent nonrandom long-term establishment of genome duplications suggests a link with environmental conditions. Whole-genome duplications seem to correlate with periods of extinction or global change, while polyploids often thrive in harsh or disturbed environments. Evidence is also accumulating that biotic interactions, for instance, with pathogens or mutualists, affect polyploids differently than nonpolyploids. Here, we review recent findings and insights on the effect of both abiotic and biotic stress on polyploids versus nonpolyploids and propose that stress response in general is an important and even determining factor in the establishment and success of polyploidy.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPolyploidyBiological EvolutionGenome, Plant

Identifiers

PMID33751096
PMCPMC8136868
OpenAlexW3122540149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.