Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33751024›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2021

Thirteen Questions About Using Machine Learning in Causal Research (You Won't Believe the Answer to Number 10!).

Stephen J Mooney, Alexander P Keil, Daniel J Westreich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Potential of artificial intelligence in injury prevention research and practice.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024
    Article
  5. Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  6. Table 2 Fallacy in Descriptive Epidemiology: Bringing Machine Learning to the Table.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen J Mooney
Alexander P Keil
Daniel J Westreich

Funding

From patients to policy: innovative epidemiology for implementation scienceDP2HD084070 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WESTREICH, DANIEL J · 2014 to 2014
$2.3M
Public health priority setting for environmental metals mixtures and birth defectsR01ES029531 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRY, REBECCA · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
The Automatic Context Measurement Tool: bringing environmental data to non-specialistsK99LM012868 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MOONEY, STEPHEN JOHN · 2018 to 2018
$127k
NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD084070NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029531NLM NIH HHS K99 LM012868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning is gaining prominence in the health sciences, where much of its use has focused on data-driven prediction. However, machine learning can also be embedded within causal analyses, potentially reducing biases arising from model misspecification. Using a question-and-answer format, we provide an introduction and orientation for epidemiologists interested in using machine learning but concerned about potential bias or loss of rigor due to use of "black box" models. We conclude with sample software code that may lower the barrier to entry to using these techniques.

Indexed as

CausalityData Interpretation, StatisticalEpidemiologic MethodsMachine LearningAlgorithmsBiasHumanscausal inferencedouble-robustnessepidemiologic methodsinverse probability weightingmachine learningpropensity scoretargeted maximum likelihood estimation

Identifiers

PMID33751024
PMCPMC8555423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.