Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750937›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2023

Penile implant infection part 3: the changing spectrum of treatment.

Tobias S Köhler, Lexiaochuan Wen, Steven K Wilson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias S KöhlerDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Kohler.tobias@mayo.edu.
Lexiaochuan WenDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8912-3899
Steven K WilsonDepartment of Urology, Institute for Urologic Excellence, La Quinta, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9342-5475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile prosthesis infection remains a rare but devastating complication of implantation. Historically, management of device infection was always extirpation. While certainly effective, device removal leaves an unhappy patient with a shortened penis. In this last part of a three-part series on the topic of penile prosthesis infection, we seek to highlight new and emerging ideas of infection management which have allowed surgeons the option of preserving the implanted status in select patients.

Indexed as

Penile DiseasesPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisHumansMalePenis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.