Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750784›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Graded recruitment of pupil-linked neuromodulation by parametric stimulation of the vagus nerve.

Zakir Mridha, Jan Willem de Gee, Yanchen Shi, Rayan Alkashgari, Justin Williams, Aaron Suminski, Matthew P Ward, Wenhao Zhang, Matthew James McGinley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06294509 (Feasibility and Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Timings in a Sensorimotor Task), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06294509 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Timings in a Sensorimotor Task

TypeinterventionalSponsorOlivier LambercyRan2024 to 2025Enrolled75ConditionsHealthyArmsin-house developed transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Modality-general sensitivity of pupil responses to regularity violations.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zakir Mridha *Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jan Willem de Gee *Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-8282
Yanchen ShiDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-4137
Rayan AlkashgariDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Madison, WI, USA.
Justin WilliamsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8710-7497
Aaron SuminskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew P WardDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Wenhao ZhangDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Matthew James McGinleyDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. matthew.mcginley@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6516-9670
Baylor College of Medicine · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Elucidating neural circuits and pupil readouts of motivated effortful listeningR01DC017797 · NIDCD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MCGINLEY, MATTHEW J · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Neuromodulatory mechanisms of listening effortR03DC015618 · NIDCD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MCGINLEY, MATTHEW J · 2016 to 2018
$476k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017797NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC015618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is thought to affect neural activity by recruiting brain-wide release of neuromodulators. VNS is used in treatment-resistant epilepsy, and is increasingly being explored for other disorders, such as depression, and as a cognitive enhancer. However, the promise of VNS is only partially fulfilled due to a lack of mechanistic understanding of the transfer function between stimulation parameters and neuromodulatory response, together with a lack of biosensors for assaying stimulation efficacy in real time. We here develop an approach to VNS in head-fixed mice on a treadmill and show that pupil dilation is a reliable and convenient biosensor for VNS-evoked cortical neuromodulation. In an 'optimal' zone of stimulation parameters, current leakage and off-target effects are minimized and the extent of pupil dilation tracks VNS-evoked basal-forebrain cholinergic axon activity in neocortex. Thus, pupil dilation is a sensitive readout of the moment-by-moment, titratable effects of VNS on brain state.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCerebellar CortexEpilepsyFemaleLocus CoeruleusMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPupilVagus NerveVagus Nerve StimulationWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID33750784
PMCPMC7943774
OpenAlexW3134944998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.