Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750778›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

The impact of contact tracing and household bubbles on deconfinement strategies for COVID-19.

Lander Willem, Steven Abrams, Pieter J K Libin, Pietro Coletti, Elise Kuylen, Oana Petrof, Signe Møgelmose, James Wambua, Sereina A Herzog, Christel Faes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemicThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A dashboard for the evaluation of the effect of school closures on wellbeing of children and parents.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lander WillemCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. lander.willem@uantwerp.be.ORCID 0000-0002-9210-1196
Steven AbramsData Science Institute, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7353-9304
Pieter J K LibinData Science Institute, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Pietro ColettiData Science Institute, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Elise KuylenCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Oana PetrofData Science Institute, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Signe MøgelmoseData Science Institute, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
James WambuaData Science Institute, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1371-0170
Sereina A HerzogCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5373-5866
Christel FaesData Science Institute, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Philippe BeutelsCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Niel HensCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-0637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused many governments to impose policies restricting social interactions. A controlled and persistent release of lockdown measures covers many potential strategies and is subject to extensive scenario analyses. Here, we use an individual-based model (STRIDE) to simulate interactions between 11 million inhabitants of Belgium at different levels including extended household settings, i.e., "household bubbles". The burden of COVID-19 is impacted by both the intensity and frequency of physical contacts, and therefore, household bubbles have the potential to reduce hospital admissions by 90%. In addition, we find that it is crucial to complete contact tracing 4 days after symptom onset. Assumptions on the susceptibility of children affect the impact of school reopening, though we find that business and leisure-related social mixing patterns have more impact on COVID-19 associated disease burden. An optimal deployment of the mitigation policies under study require timely compliance to physical distancing, testing and self-isolation.

Indexed as

Contact TracingFamily CharacteristicsQuarantineAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumChildChild, PreschoolCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Disease Transmission, InfectiousHealth PolicyHospitalizationHumans

Identifiers

PMID33750778
PMCPMC7943552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.