Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750735›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

An Agent-Based Model of the Local Spread of SARS-CoV-2: Modeling Study.

Alessio Staffini, Akiko Kishi Svensson, Ung-Il Chung, Thomas Svensson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessio Staffini *Department of Economics and Finance, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5001-349X
Akiko Kishi SvenssonPrecision Health, Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2464-1932
Ung-Il ChungPrecision Health, Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4691-6394
Thomas SvenssonPrecision Health, Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-358X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe spread of SARS-CoV-2, originating in Wuhan, China, was classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. The governments of affected countries have implemented various measures to limit the spread of the virus. The starting point of this paper is the different government approaches, in terms of promulgating new legislative regulations to limit the virus diffusion and to contain negative effects on the populations.

objectiveThis paper aims to study how the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is linked to government policies and to analyze how different policies have produced different results on public health.

methodsConsidering the official data provided by 4 countries (Italy, Germany, Sweden, and Brazil) and from the measures implemented by each government, we built an agent-based model to study the effects that these measures will have over time on different variables such as the total number of COVID-19 cases, intensive care unit (ICU) bed occupancy rates, and recovery and case-fatality rates. The model we implemented provides the possibility of modifying some starting variables, and it was thus possible to study the effects that some policies (eg, keeping the national borders closed or increasing the ICU beds) would have had on the spread of the infection.

resultsThe 4 considered countries have adopted different containment measures for COVID-19, and the forecasts provided by the model for the considered variables have given different results. Italy and Germany seem to be able to limit the spread of the infection and any eventual second wave, while Sweden and Brazil do not seem to have the situation under control. This situation is also reflected in the forecasts of pressure on the National Health Services, which see Sweden and Brazil with a high occupancy rate of ICU beds in the coming months, with a consequent high number of deaths.

conclusionsIn line with what we expected, the obtained results showed that the countries that have taken restrictive measures in terms of limiting the population mobility have managed more successfully than others to contain the spread of COVID-19. Moreover, the model demonstrated that herd immunity cannot be reached even in countries that have relied on a strategy without strict containment measures.

Indexed as

agentagent-based modelingcomputationcomputational epidemiologycomputational modelsCOVID-19epidemiologymodelingpolicypublic healthSARS-CoV-2spread

Identifiers

PMID33750735
PMCPMC8025915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.