Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750519›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2021

Native kidney small renal masses in patients with kidney transplants: Does chronic immunosuppression affect tumor biology?

Ari P Bernstein, Meenakshi Davuluri, Matthew DeMasi, Alexander Sankin, Kara Watts, Ahmed Aboumohamed, Joshua M Stern, Juan Rocca, Stuart Greenstein, Jay A Graham and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ari P BernsteinAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Meenakshi DavuluriDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Matthew DeMasiAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Alexander SankinDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Kara WattsDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Ahmed AboumohamedDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Joshua M SternDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Juan RoccaMontefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, New York, NY, United States.
Stuart GreensteinMontefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, New York, NY, United States.
Jay A GrahamMontefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, New York, NY, United States.
Maria AjaimyMontefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, New York, NY, United States.
Luz Liriano-WardMontefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, New York, NY, United States.
Judy SarungbamDepartment of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York NY, United States.
Evan KovacDepartment of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Montefiore Medical Center · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe compared clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of radical nephrectomy (RN) for small renal masses (SRM) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) before or after transplant at a high-volume urologic and transplant center.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients with ESRD (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <15 mL/min) who underwent RN for suspected malignant SRM from 2000-2018. Group 1 consisted of patients who underwent RN after transplant; group 2 underwent RN prior to transplant, and group 3 underwent RN without subsequent transplant. Dominant tumor size and histopathological characteristics, recurrence, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare categorical and continuous baseline and histopathologic characteristics, respectively. Univariate analysis and log rank test were used to compare RCC recurrence rates.

resultsWe identified 34 nephrectomies in group 1, 27 nephrectomies in group 2, and 70 nephrectomies in group 3. Median time from transplant to SRM radiological diagnosis in group 1 was 87 months, and three months from diagnosis to nephrectomy for all groups. There were no statistically significant differences between pathological dominant mass size, histological subtype breakdown, grade, or stage between the groups. Rates of benign histology were similar between the groups. Univariate analysis did not reveal a statistically significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the groups (p=0.9).

conclusionsPatients undergoing nephrectomy before or after transplant for SRM have similar indolent clinicopathological characteristics and low recurrence rates. Our results suggest that chronic immunosuppression does not adversely affect SRM biology.

Identifiers

PMID33750519
PMCPMC8525532
OpenAlexW3136308078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.