Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750425›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Medical dispatchers' perception of the interaction with the caller during emergency calls - a qualitative study.

Thea Palsgaard Møller, Hejdi Gamst Jensen, Søren Viereck, Freddy Lippert, Doris Østergaaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The competency requirements for emergency medical services call takers and dispatchers - a scoping review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thea Palsgaard MøllerCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Telegrafvej 5, 2750, Copenhagen, Denmark. tpm@dadlnet.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7658-2447
Hejdi Gamst JensenCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Telegrafvej 5, 2750, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren ViereckCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Telegrafvej 5, 2750, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Freddy LippertCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Telegrafvej 5, 2750, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Doris ØstergaaardCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juulsvej 1, 2700, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical dispatching is a highly complex procedure and has an impact upon patient outcome. It includes call-taking and triage, prioritization of resources and the provision of guidance and instructions to callers. Whilst emergency medical dispatchers play a key role in the process, their perception of the process is rarely reported. We explored medical dispatchers' perception of the interaction with the caller during emergency calls. Secondly, we aimed to develop a model for emergency call handling based on these findings.

methodsTo provide an in-depth understanding of the dispatching process, an explorative qualitative interview study was designed. A grounded theory design and thematic analysis were applied.

resultsA total of 5 paramedics and 6 registered nurses were interviewed. The emerging themes derived from dispatchers' perception of the emergency call process were related to both the callers and the medical dispatchers themselves, from which four and three themes were identified, respectively. Dispatchers reported that for callers, the motive for calling, the situation, the perception and presentation of the problem was influencing factors. For the dispatchers the expertise, teamwork and organization influenced the process. Based on the medical dispatchers´ perception, a model of the workflow and interaction between the caller and the dispatcher was developed based on themes related to the caller and the dispatcher.

conclusionsAccording to medical dispatchers, the callers seem to lack knowledge about best utilization of the emergency number and the medical dispatching process, which can be improved by public awareness campaigns and incorporating information into first aid courses. For medical dispatchers the most potent modifiable factors were based upon the continuous professional development of the medical dispatchers and the system that supports them. The model of call handling underlines the complexity of medical dispatching that embraces the context of the call beyond clinical presentation of the problem.

Indexed as

EmergenciesQualitative ResearchAdultEmergency Medical DispatcherEmergency Medical Service Communication SystemsEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionTriageEmergency call handlingEmergency medical servicesMedical dispatchTriage

Identifiers

PMID33750425
PMCPMC7941984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.