ArticleBMC health services research2021
When time matters: a qualitative study on hospital staff's strategies for meeting the target times in cancer patient pathways.
Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the policy implementation of a holistic approach to cancer investigation in non-specific symptom pathways in England: An ethnographic study.Journal of health services research & policy · 2025Article
- Healthcare professionals' experiences of eHealth in palliative care for older people: challenges, compromises and the price of dignity.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024Article
- A data-driven approach to solve the RT scheduling problem.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Performance of standardized cancer patient pathways in Sweden visualized using observational data and a state-transition model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deconstructing (e)health literacy: aspects that promote and inhibit understanding of health information in breast cancer patient pathways.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2022Article
- Exploring wait time variations in a prostate cancer patient pathway-A qualitative study.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022Article
- Merging existing practices with new ones: the adjustment of organizational routines to using cancer patient pathways in primary healthcare.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Equitable access to cancer patient pathways in Norway - a national registry-based study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- CPP or Not, That Is the Question: Physicians' Work With Activating CPPs.Qualitative health research · 2021Article
- Older People's Voices Matter!: Possibilities and Limitations for Providing Dignified Palliative Care with Wearable Devices.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer patient pathways (CPPs) were introduced in Norway in 2015. CPPs are time-bound standardised care pathways that describe the organisation of and responsibilities for diagnostics and treatment, as well as communication with the patient and next of kin. The aim is to ensure that cancer patients experience a well-organised, coherent and predictable pathway without any delays in assessment and diagnostics caused by non-medical reasons. Preventing delays in diagnostics by meeting specific target times is central to the successful implementation of CPPs. The aim of this paper is to describe how hospital staff cope with the increased focus on meeting CPP target times and the measures and strategies implemented by hospitals and their staff.
methodsData for this paper were collected in a larger study on implementation and experiences with CPPs among hospital staff, general practitioners, and patients in Norway (2017-2020). The study had a qualitative cross-sectional design, and data were collected through interviews. This article is based on semi-structured interviews with hospital staff (N = 60) in five hospitals.
resultsHospital staff are highly aware of the target times, and try to comply with them, in the interest of both the patients and the hospitals. The implementation of CPPs was not accompanied by the allocation of additional resources; therefore, hospitals could not simply increase capacity to meet the target times. Instead, they had to develop other strategies. Four categories of strategies were identified: (i) introducing new roles and more staff, (ii) reorganising the workflow, (iii) gaming the system and (iv) outsourcing services.
conclusionsHospital staff are torn between meeting the target times and a lack of resources and capacity. This is not unusual in the current healthcare context, where staff face organisational reforms and increasing demands on a regular basis. It is important to recognise frontline workers' efforts towards realising new organisational changes. Therefore, carefully weighing the benefits against the costs and undertaking the necessary planning are important in the design and implementation of future care and treatment pathways for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.