Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750360›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Discrete choice experiment for eliciting preference for health services for patients with ALS and their informal caregivers.

Katy Tobin, Sinead Maguire, Bernie Corr, Charles Normand, Orla Hardiman, Miriam Galvin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katy Tobin *Global Brain Health Institute, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. katy.tobin@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8537-3273
Sinead Maguire *Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Bernie CorrDepartment of Neurology, National Neuroscience Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Charles NormandCentre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Orla Hardiman *Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Miriam Galvin *Academic Unit of Neurology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IEBeaumont Hospital · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

Health Research Board ICE/2012/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative condition with a mean life expectancy of 3 years from first symptom. Understanding the factors that are important to both patients and their caregivers has the potential to enhance service delivery and engagement, and improve efficiency. The Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) is a stated preferences method which asks service users to make trade-offs for various attributes of health services. This method is used to quantify preferences and shows the relative importance of the attributes in the experiment, to the service user.

methodsA DCE with nine choice sets was developed to measure the preferences for health services of ALS patients and their caregivers and the relative importance of various aspects of care, such as timing of care, availability of services, and decision making. The DCE was presented to patients with ALS, and their caregivers, recruited from a national multidisciplinary clinic. A random effects probit model was applied to estimate the impact of each attribute on a participant's choice.

resultsPatients demonstrated the strongest preferences about timing of receiving information about ALS. A strong preference was also placed on seeing the hospice care team later rather than early on in the illness. Patients also indicated their willingness to consider the use of communication devices. Grouping by stage of disease, patients who were in earlier stages of disease showed a strong preference for receipt of extensive information about ALS at the time of diagnosis. Caregivers showed a strong preference for engagement with healthcare professionals, an attribute that was not prioritised by patients.

conclusionsThe DCE method can be useful in uncovering priorities of patients and caregivers with ALS. Patients and caregivers have different priorities relating to health services and the provision of care in ALS, and patient preferences differ based on the stage and duration of their illness. Multidisciplinary teams must calibrate the delivery of care in the context of the differing expectations, needs and priorities of the patient/caregiver dyad.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCaregiversChoice BehaviorHealth PersonnelHealth ServicesHumansPatient PreferenceAmyotrophic Lateral sclerosisCaregiver preferenceDiscrete choice experimentHealth servicesPatient preference

Identifiers

PMID33750360
PMCPMC7941893
OpenAlexW3136809697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.