Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750343›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical imaging2021

A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT.

Thomas Atta-Fosu, Michael LaBarbera, Soumya Ghose, Paul Schoenhagen, Walid Saliba, Patrick J Tchou, Bruce D Lindsay, Milind Y Desai, Deborah Kwon, Mina K Chung and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Machine learning prediction of outcome following pulsed-field atrial fibrillation ablation: patient selection and risk factors.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Automated analysis of electrogram characteristics in baseline rhythm can distinguish isthmus regions and segments in reentrant ventricular tachycardia.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The right modality for the right pulmonary vein shape in ablation for atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas Atta-FosuCenter for Computational Imaging and Personalized Diagnostics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 2071 Martin Luther King Drive, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7207, USA. txa128@case.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9259-3592
Michael LaBarberaCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Soumya GhoseCenter for Computational Imaging and Personalized Diagnostics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 2071 Martin Luther King Drive, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7207, USA.
Paul SchoenhagenDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Walid SalibaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Patrick J TchouDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Bruce D LindsayDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Milind Y DesaiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Deborah KwonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mina K Chung *Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Anant Madabhushi *Center for Computational Imaging and Personalized Diagnostics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 2071 Martin Luther King Drive, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7207, USA.

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024989 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PAMELA B · 2007 to 2011
$53.7M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
Functional Genomics of Atrial Fibrillation in Human AtriaR01HL111314 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI BARNARD, JOHN, CHUNG, MINA KAY · 2012 to 2019
$6.1M
Pathology CoreU54CA254566 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2020 to 2024
$5.0M
Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (QuHbIC) in HPV + Oropharyngeal CarcinomaR01CA220581 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYFMAN, SHLOMO, LEWIS, JAMES · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
RadxTools for assessing tumor treatment response on imagingU01CA248226 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI TIWARI, PALLAVI, VISWANATH, SATISH EASWAR · 2020 to 2022
$1.4M
HistoTools: A suite of digital pathology tools for quality control, annotation and dataset identificationU01CA239055 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JANOWCZYK, ANDREW ROBERT, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2019 to 2022
$1.0M
DOD Prostate Cancer Research Program (US) W81XWH-15-1-0558DOD Prostrate Cancer Research Program (US) W81XWH-20-1-0851NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA239055-01NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA248226-01NCI NIH HHS 1U24CA199374-01NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA254566-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220581NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U01 CA248226NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NCI NIH HHS U54 CA254566NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024989NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF-) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence.

methodsThis retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF- CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation.

resultsDifferences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features.

conclusionDifferences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationMachine LearningAgedAtrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationFemaleHeart AtriaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisPulmonary VeinsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAtrial fibrillationAtrial fibrillation recurrenceAtrial radiomic featuresAtrial shape morphologyLeft atriumShape differentiation

Identifiers

PMID33750343
PMCPMC7941998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.