Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750317›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2021

Outpatient care in acute and prehospital emergency medicine by emergency medical and patient transport service over a 10-year period: a retrospective study based on dispatch data from a German emergency medical dispatch centre (OFF-RESCUE).

Marc S Schehadat, Guido Scherer, David A Groneberg, Manfred Kaps, Michael H K Bendels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Regional differences, repeated use, and costs of emergency medical services in Germany.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marc S SchehadatInstitute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, House 9b, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. marc.schehadat@hotmail.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4217-6066
Guido SchererDistrict Administration Mainz-Bingen, Department of Civil Protection, Ingelheim/Rhein, Germany.
David A GronebergInstitute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, House 9b, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Manfred KapsDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany.
Michael H K BendelsInstitute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, House 9b, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of operations by the German emergency medical service almost doubled between 1994 and 2016. The associated expenses increased by 380% in a similar period. Operations with treatment on-site, which retrospectively proved to be misallocated (OFF-Missions), have a substantial proportion of the assignment of the emergency medical service (EMS). Besides OFF-Missions, operations with patient transport play a dominant role (named as ON-Missions). The aim of this study is to work out the medical and economic relevance of both operation types.

methodsThis analysis examined N = 819,780 missions of the EMS and patient transport service (PTS) in the catchment area of the emergency medical dispatch centre (EMDC) Bad Kreuznach over the period from 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2016 in terms of triage and disposition, urban-rural distribution, duration of operations and economic relevance (p < .01).

results53.4% of ON-Missions are triaged with the indication non-life-threatening patient transport; however, 63.7% are processed by the devices of the EMS. Within the OFF-Mission cohort, 78.2 and 85.8% are triaged or dispatched for the EMS. 74% of all ON-Missions are located in urban areas, 26% in rural areas; 81.3% of rural operations are performed by the EMS. 66% of OFF-Missions are in cities. 93.2% of the remaining 34% of operations in rural locations are also performed by the EMS. The odds for both ON- and OFF-Missions in rural areas are significantly higher than for PTS (OR

conclusionsThis study particularly highlights the increasing utilization of emergency devices; especially in OFF-Missions, the resources of the EMS have a higher number of operations than PTS. OFF-Missions cause immensely high costs due to misallocations from an economic point of view. Appropriate patient management appears necessary from both medical and economic perspective, which requires multiple solution approaches.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical DispatchEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency MedicineAmbulatory CareGermanyHumansRetrospective StudiesDispatchedEmergency medical control centerEmergency medical dispatchJob cycle timeOFF-MissionON-MissionPrehospital emergency careRuralTriagedUrban

Identifiers

PMID33750317
PMCPMC7941891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.