Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750316›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Strengthened workplace relationships facilitate recovery at work - qualitative experiences of an intervention among employees in primary health care.

Lina Ejlertsson, Bodil Heijbel, Ingemar H Andersson, Margareta Troein, Annika Brorsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lina EjlertssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Family Medicine and Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. lina.ejlertsson@med.lu.se.
Bodil HeijbelDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Family Medicine and Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Ingemar H AnderssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Family Medicine and Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Margareta TroeinDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Family Medicine and Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Annika BrorssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Family Medicine and Community Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe literature on workplace interventions focusing on recovery is scarce; hence this study intends to expand that knowledge. An intervention was run for one year, aiming at increasing the experience of recovery during the workday among primary health care employees. During the intervention, different forms of recovery activities were integrated into the daily work at six primary health care centres. The aim of this study was to explore the intervention process and its effects.

methodsAfter completion of an intervention, 39 employees in seven focus groups were interviewed about their experiences of the intervention. A semi-structured interview guide was used, and the qualitative analysis was conducted by systematic text condensation.

resultsDespite different conditions and attitudes when the project was launched, the participants portrayed a positive outcome of the intervention at all six workplaces. Four promoting factors for intervention success were identified: support, legitimacy, customization, and simplicity. Also, three areas of improvement during the intervention period were described: the workplace climate, employee well-being, and recovery awareness, which in turn became promoting factors.

conclusionsAn intervention aiming at increasing workplace recovery can be promoted by support, legitimacy, customization, and simplicity. By using these promoting factors, health care workplaces can implement activity models which could increase employees' experiences of recovery during the workday. Positive effects on workplace climate and employee well-being can also be achieved.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthWorkplaceFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHealth PromotionHumansPrimary Health CareEmployee healthHealth promotionInterventionPrimary health careQualitative researchRecovery

Identifiers

PMID33750316
PMCPMC7942012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.