Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33750308›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2021

Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens.

Lang Yang, Hua Jin, Xiao-Li Xie, Yang-Tian Cao, Zhen-Hua Liu, Na Li, Peng Jin, Yu-Qi He, Jian-Qiu Sheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Increased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with squamous dysplasia: a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lang YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Hua JinDepartment of Pathology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Li XieDepartment of Pathology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yang-Tian CaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Zhen-Hua LiuDepartment of Pathology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Na LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Peng JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yu-Qi HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
Jian-Qiu ShengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmencang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China. jianqiu@263.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9455-0198
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatment. In this study we aimed to investigate how to solve this histological discrepancy and avoid over- and under-treatment.

methodsThe medical records of patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia who underwent endoscopic resection at our hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The histological discrepancy between the biopsy and resected specimens was calculated and its association with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed.

resultsA total of 137 lesions from 129 patients were included. The discrepancy rate between forceps biopsy and resected specimens was 45.3% (62/137). Histological discrepancy was associated with the histological category of the biopsy (p < 0.001). In addition, 17 of the 30 (56.7%) biopsies that was diagnosed as indefinite/negative for neoplasia or low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were upgraded to HGIN or ESCC after resection. The upgrade was due to lesion size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.002) and type B intrapapillary capillary loops (p < 0.001). Moreover, 34 of the 83 biopsies that were diagnosed with HGIN were upgraded to ESCC after resection, which was related to lesion size (p = 0.001), location (p = 0.018), and pink color sign (p = 0.002).

conclusionsHistological discrepancy between forceps biopsy and resected specimens is common in clinical practice. Recognizing the risk factors for each histological category of biopsy may reduce these discrepancies and improve clinical management.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaBiopsyEpithelial CellsHumansRetrospective StudiesBiopsyEndoscopyEsophageal neoplasiaHistology

Identifiers

PMID33750308
PMCPMC7941920
OpenAlexW3136637156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.