Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33749777›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2021

Prediction model of random forest for the risk of hyperuricemia in a Chinese basic health checkup test.

Yuhan Gao, Shichong Jia, Dihua Li, Chao Huang, Zhaowei Meng, Yan Wang, Mei Yu, Tianyi Xu, Ming Liu, Jinhong Sun and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuhan Gao *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Shichong Jia *School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Dihua Li *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Acute Abdomen Disease Associated Organ Injury and ITCWM Repair, Institute of Acute Abdominal Diseases, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Chao HuangSenior Lecturer in Statistics, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, U.K.
Zhaowei MengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Yan WangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jian Kang Chan Ye Yuan, Jinghai District, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Mei YuCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Networking (TANK Lab), Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin, China.
Tianyi XuCollege of Intelligence and Computing, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Advanced Networking (TANK Lab), Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cognitive Computing and Application, Tianjin, China.
Ming LiuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Jinhong SunDepartment of Health Management, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Qiyu JiaDepartment of Health Management, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Health Management, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Ying GaoDepartment of Health Management, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Kun SongDepartment of Health Management, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Xing WangDepartment of Health Management, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Yaguang FanTianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, P.R. China.
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · CNHull York Medical School · GBShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTianjin Nankai Hospital · CNTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study aimed to develop a random forest (RF) based prediction model for hyperuricemia (HUA) and compare its performance with the conventional logistic regression (LR) model.

methodsThis cross-sectional study recruited 91,690 participants (14,032 with HUA, 77,658 without HUA). We constructed a RF-based prediction model in the training sets and evaluated it in the validation sets. Performance of the RF model was compared with the LR model by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of the RF models were 0.702 and 0.650 in males, 0.767 and 0.721 in females. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 0.372 and 0.881 in males, 0.159 and 0.978 in females. AUC of the RF models was 0.739 (0.728-0.750) in males and 0.818 (0.799-0.837) in females. AUC of the LR models were 0.730 (0.718-0.741) for males and 0.815 (0.795-0.835) for females. The predictive power of RF was slightly higher than that of LR, but was not statistically significant in females (Delong tests, P=0.0015 for males, P=0.5415 for females).

conclusionCompared with LR, the good performance in HUA status prediction and the tolerance of features associations or interactions showed great potential of RF in further application. A prospective cohort is necessary for HUA developing prediction. People with high risk factors should be encouraged to actively control to reduce the probability of developing HUA.

Indexed as

AdultChinaDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansHyperuricemiaMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalHyperuricemiaprediction modelrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID33749777
PMCPMC8026814
OpenAlexW3136136400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.