Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33749772›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2021

Centralized repeated resectability assessment of patients with colorectal liver metastases during first-line treatment: prospective study.

H Isoniemi, A Uutela, A Nordin, E Lantto, I Kellokumpu, A Ovissi, J Kosunen, R Kallio, L M Soveri, T Salminen and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

H IsoniemiDepartment of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6184-3405
A UutelaDepartment of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
A NordinDepartment of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
E LanttoDepartment of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
I KellokumpuDepartment of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.
A OvissiDepartment of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
J KosunenDepartment of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
R KallioDepartment of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
L M SoveriDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
T SalminenDepartment of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
A ÅlgarsDepartment of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
A LamminmäkiDepartment of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
P HalonenDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
R RistamäkiDepartment of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
J RäsänenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
H KarjulaDepartment of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4238-8918
Y VaalavuoDepartment of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
M LavoniusDepartment of Surgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
P OsterlundDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FIOulu University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FIKuopio University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastasectomy is probably underused in metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of centralized repeated assessment on resectability rate of liver metastases.

methodsThe prospective RAXO study was a nationwide study in Finland. Patients with treatable metastatic colorectal cancer at any site were eligible. This planned substudy included patients with baseline liver metastases between 2012 and 2018. Resectability was reassessed by the multidisciplinary team at Helsinki tertiary referral centre upfront and twice during first-line systemic therapy. Outcomes were resectability rates, management changes, and survival.

resultsOf 812 patients included, 301 (37.1 per cent) had liver-only metastases. Of these, tumours were categorized as upfront resectable in 161 (53.5 per cent), and became amenable to surgery during systemic treatment in 63 (20.9 per cent). Some 207 patients (68.7 per cent) eventually underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy in resectability between central and local judgement was noted for 102 patients (33.9 per cent). Median disease-free survival (DFS) after first resection was 20 months and overall survival (OS) 79 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 80, 32, and 21 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, and 5-year OS rates were 68, 37, and 9 per cent, respectively. Liver and extrahepatic metastases were present in 511 patients. Of these, tumours in 72 patients (14.1 per cent) were categorized as upfront resectable, and 53 patients (10.4 per cent) became eligible for surgery. Eventually 110 patients (21.5 per cent) underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy between local and central resectability was noted for 116 patients (22.7 per cent). Median DFS from first resection was 7 months and median OS 55 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 79, 42, and 17 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, with 5-year OS rates of 65, 39, and 2 per cent, respectively.

conclusionRepeated centralized resectability assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases improved resection and survival rates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMetastasectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33749772
PMCPMC10364914
OpenAlexW3136283472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.