Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33749770›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Association of Age With SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response.

He S Yang, Victoria Costa, Sabrina E Racine-Brzostek, Karen P Acker, Jim Yee, Zhengming Chen, Mohsen Karbaschi, Robert Zuk, Sophie Rand, Ashley Sukhu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 254 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Is It Time to Reassess the Target Age of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Globally?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

He S YangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Victoria CostaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Sabrina E Racine-BrzostekDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Karen P AckerDivision of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jim YeeNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Campus, New York, New York.
Zhengming ChenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Mohsen KarbaschiET HealthCare, Palo Alto, California.
Robert ZukET HealthCare, Palo Alto, California.
Sophie RandDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Ashley SukhuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
P J KlasseDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Melissa M CushingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Amy ChadburnDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Zhen ZhaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Cornell University · USPresbyterian Hospital · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

Structural studies of native-like SOSIP trimersP01AI110657 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI MOORE, JOHN P · 2015 to 2024
$35.4M
Neutralization of Primate Immunodeficiency VirusesR01AI036082 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JOHN P MOORE · 1994 to 2026
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI110657NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI036082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Accumulating evidence suggests that children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are more likely to manifest mild symptoms and are at a lower risk of developing severe respiratory disease compared with adults. It remains unknown how the immune response in children differs from that of adolescents and adults. Objective: To investigate the association of age with the quantity and quality of SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used 31 426 SARS-CoV-2 antibody test results from pediatric and adult patients. Data were collected from a New York City hospital from April 9 to August 31, 2020. The semiquantitative immunoglobin (Ig) G levels were compared between 85 pediatric and 3648 adult patients. Further analysis of SARS-CoV-2 antibody profiles was performed on sera from 126 patients aged 1 to 24 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity rates and IgG levels were evaluated in patients from a wide range of age groups (1-102 years). SARS-CoV-2 IgG level, total antibody (TAb) level, surrogate neutralizing antibody (SNAb) activity, and antibody binding avidity were compared between children (aged 1-10 years), adolescents (aged 11-18 years), and young adults (aged 19-24 years). Results: Among 31 426 antibody test results (19 797 [63.0%] female patients), with 1194 pediatric patients (mean [SD] age, 11.0 [5.3] years) and 30 232 adult patients (mean [SD] age, 49.2 [17.1] years), the seroprevalence in the pediatric (197 [16.5%; 95% CI, 14.4%-18.7%]) and adult (5630 [18.6%; 95% CI, 18.2%-19.1%]) patient populations was similar. The SARS-CoV-2 IgG level showed a negative correlation with age in the pediatric population (r = -0.45, P < .001) and a moderate but positive correlation with age in adults (r = 0.24, P < .001). Patients aged 19 to 30 years exhibited the lowest IgG levels (eg, aged 25-30 years vs 1-10 years: 99 [44-180] relative fluorescence units [RFU] vs 443 [188-851] RFU). In the subset cohort aged 1 to 24 years, IgG, TAb, SNAb and avidity were negatively correlated with age (eg, IgG: r = -0.51; P < .001). Children exhibited higher median (IQR) IgG levels, TAb levels, and SNAb activity compared with adolescents (eg, IgG levels: 473 [233-656] RFU vs 191 [82-349] RFU; P < .001) and young adults (eg, IgG levels: 473 [233-656] RFU vs 85 [38-150] RFU; P < .001). Adolescents also exhibited higher median (IQR) TAb levels, IgG levels, and SNAb activity than young adults (eg, TAb levels: 961 [290-2074] RFU vs 370 [125-697]; P = .006). In addition, children had higher antibody binding avidity compared with young adults, but the difference was not significant. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that SARS-CoV-2 viral specific antibody response profiles are distinct in different age groups. Age-targeted strategies for disease screening and management as well as vaccine development may be warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Age FactorsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody AffinityAntibody FormationChildCorrelation of DataCOVID-19 Serological TestingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID33749770
PMCPMC7985726
OpenAlexW3136275452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.