Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33749662›Full record

ReviewJCI insight2021

Therapeutic manipulation of innate lymphoid cells.

Laura M Cobb, Michael R Verneris

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JCI insight, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. ILC2s - development, divergence, dispersal.Current opinion in immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura M Cobb
Michael R Verneris
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders · US

Funding

Characterizing Innate Immune Dysregulation in Tonsils of Individuals with Down SyndromeR01HL155691 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VERNERIS, MICHAEL R. · 2020 to 2020
$3.0M
Lymphoid Tissue Inducer/NK22 Cells and Post-transplant Immune RecoveryR01AI100879 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI VERNERIS, MICHAEL R. · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155691NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since their relatively recent discovery, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) have been shown to be tissue-resident lymphocytes that are critical mediators of tissue homeostasis, regeneration, and pathogen response. However, ILC dysregulation contributes to a diverse spectrum of human diseases, spanning virtually every organ system. ILCs rapidly respond to environmental cues by altering their own phenotype and function as well as influencing the behavior of other local tissue-resident cells. With a growing understanding of ILC biology, investigators continue to elucidate mechanisms that expand our ability to phenotype, isolate, target, and expand ILCs ex vivo. With mounting preclinical data and clinical correlates, the role of ILCs in both disease pathogenesis and resolution is evident, justifying ILC manipulation for clinical benefit. This Review will highlight areas of ongoing translational research and critical questions for future study that will enable us to harness the full therapeutic potential of these captivating cells.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyImmunity, InnateHomeostasisHumansLymphoid Tissue

Identifiers

PMID33749662
PMCPMC8026185
OpenAlexW3138826332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.