ArticleCancer medicine2021
Identification of an individualized RNA binding protein-based prognostic signature for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deubiquitinase TRIM44 Promotes Autophagy-Mediated Chemoresistance in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.Hematological oncology · 2025Article
- CMSS1: A RNA binding protein with pivotal roles in non-small cell lung cancer progression and prognosis.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Genome-wide profiling of a prognostic RNA-binding protein signature in esophageal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Cms1 Ribosomal Small Subunit Homolog Promotes HCC Proliferation and Migration by Modulating the TNF/NF-κB Signaling Pathway.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic value and gene regulatory network of CMSS1 in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2024Article
- Identification of three small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) as potential prognostic markers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- An Autophagy-Related Gene Signature can Better Predict Prognosis and Resistance in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA binding proteins (RBPs) are increasingly appreciated as being essential for normal hematopoiesis and have a critical role in the progression of hematological malignancies. However, their functional consequences and clinical significance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remain unknown. Here, we conducted a systematic analysis to identify RBP-related genes affecting DLBCL prognosis based on the Gene Expression Omnibus database. By univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression (CPHR) methods, six RBPs-related genes (CMSS1, MAEL, THOC5, PSIP1, SNIP1, and ZCCHC7) were identified closely related to the overall survival (OS) of DLBCL patients. The RBPs signature could efficiently distinguished low-risk from high-risk patients and could serve as an independent and reliable factor for predicting OS. Moreover, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed 17 significantly enriched pathways between high- versus low-risk group, including the regulation of autophagy, chronic myeloid leukemia, NOTCH signaling pathway, and B cell receptor signaling pathway. Then we developed an RBP-based nomogram combining other clinical risk factors. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated high prognostic predictive efficiency of this model with the area under the curve values were 0.820 and 0.780, respectively, in the primary set and entire set. In summary, our RBP-based model could be a novel prognostic predictor and had the potential for developing treatment targets for DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.