Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748899›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Prolonged Time from Diagnosis to Breast-Conserving Surgery is Associated with Upstaging in Hormone Receptor-Positive Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma.

Natalie Hills, Macall Leslie, Rachel Davis, Marielle Crowell, Hiroyasu Kameyama, Hallgeir Rui, Inna Chervoneva, William Dooley, Takemi Tanaka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie Hills *University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Macall Leslie *University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Rachel Davis *University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Marielle CrowellUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Hiroyasu KameyamaUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Hallgeir RuiDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Inna ChervonevaDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
William DooleyDepartment of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Takemi TanakaUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. takemi-tanaka@ouhsc.edu.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Wade Williams · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTime to surgery (TTS) has been suggested to have an association with mortality in early-stage breast cancer.

objectiveThis study aims to determine the association between TTS and preoperative disease progression in tumor size or nodal status among women diagnosed with clinical T1N0M0 ductal breast cancer.

methodsWomen diagnosed with clinical T1N0M0 ductal breast cancer who had breast-conserving surgery as their first definitive treatment between 2010 and 2016 (n = 90,405) were analyzed using the National Cancer Database. Separate multivariable logistic regression models for hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HR-negative patients, adjusted for clinical and demographic variables, were used to assess the relationship between TTS and upstaging of tumor size (T-upstaging) or nodal status (N-upstaging).

resultsT-upstaging occurred in 6.76% of HR-positive patients and 11.00% of HR-negative patients, while N-upstaging occurred in 12.69% and 10.75% of HR-positive and HR-negative patients, respectively. Among HR-positive patients, odds of T-upstaging were higher for 61-90 days TTS (odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.34) and ≥91 days TTS (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.84) compared with ≤30 days TTS, and odds of N- upstaging were higher for ≥91 days TTS (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13-1.62). No association between TTS and either T- or N-upstaging was found among HR-negative patients. Other clinical and demographic variables, including grade, tumor location, and race/ethnicity, were associated with both T- and N-upstaging.

conclusionTTS ≥61 and ≥91 days was a significant predictor of T- and N-upstaging, respectively, in HR-positive patients; however, TTS was not associated with upstaging in HR-negative breast cancer. Delays in surgery may contribute to measurable disease progression in T1N0M0 ductal breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHormonesHumansMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm StagingHormones

Identifiers

PMID33748899
PMCPMC7982278
OpenAlexW3139075357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.