Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748792›Full record

ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2021

Latent representation learning in biology and translational medicine.

Andreas Kopf, Manfred Claassen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence for dementia prevention.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas KopfInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Manfred ClaassenDivision of Clinical Bioinformatics, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current data generation capabilities in the life sciences render scientists in an apparently contradicting situation. While it is possible to simultaneously measure an ever-increasing number of systems parameters, the resulting data are becoming increasingly difficult to interpret. Latent variable modeling allows for such interpretation by learning non-measurable hidden variables from observations. This review gives an overview over the different formal approaches to latent variable modeling, as well as applications at different scales of biological systems, such as molecular structures, intra- and intercellular regulatory up to physiological networks. The focus is on demonstrating how these approaches have enabled interpretable representations and ultimately insights in each of these domains. We anticipate that a wider dissemination of latent variable modeling in the life sciences will enable a more effective and productive interpretation of studies based on heterogeneous and high-dimensional data modalities.

Indexed as

biologylatent representation learninglatent variable modelinglife science

Identifiers

PMID33748792
PMCPMC7961186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.