Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748772›Full record

ArticleCurrent tissue microenvironment reports2020

Recent Advancements in Engineering Strategies for Manipulating Neural Stem Cell Behavior.

Brian J O'Grady, Ethan S Lippmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current tissue microenvironment reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian J O'GradyDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ethan S LippmannDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Interdisciplinary Training Program in Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG058524 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ANGELA L. JEFFERSON · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG058524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewStem cells are exquisitely sensitive to biophysical and biochemical cues within the native microenvironment. This review focuses on emerging strategies to manipulate neural cell behavior using these influences in three-dimensional (3D) culture systems. RECENT

findingsTraditional systems for neural cell differentiation typically produce heterogeneous populations with limited diversity rather than the complex, organized tissue structures observed SUMMARY: This review article highlights engineering strategies that facilitate controlled presentation of biophysical and biochemical cues to guide differentiation and impart desired phenotypes on neural cell populations. Specific highlighted examples include engineered biomaterials and microfluidic platforms for spatiotemporal control over the presentation of morphogen gradients.

Indexed as

biomaterialmorphogen gradientneural stem cellstem cell differentiation

Identifiers

PMID33748772
PMCPMC7967032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.