ArticleiScience2021
Direct current effects on afferent and hair cell to elicit natural firing patterns.
Article in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polarity-Dependent Effects of Sinusoidal Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Cardiovascular Responses During Cognitive Load.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Distribution of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels and Scaffolding Proteins on Vestibular Calyx Ending Delineates the Axon Initial Segment.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Article
- Closed-loop electrical block of vagus nerve scales from rodent to porcine cardiac models.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Exploring GVS as a display modality: cutaneous sensations and cue association maintenance.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Review
- Pulsatile electrical stimulation creates predictable, correctable disruptions in neural firing.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Galvanic vs. pulsatile effects on decision-making networks: reshaping the neural activation landscape.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- A prosthesis utilizing natural vestibular encoding strategies improves sensorimotor performance in monkeys.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Difference in Network Effects of Pulsatile and Galvanic Stimulation.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022Article
- Effects of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Vestibular Compensation in Unilaterally Labyrinthectomized Mice.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In contrast to the conventional pulsatile neuromodulation that excites neurons, galvanic or direct current stimulation can excite, inhibit, or sensitize neurons. The vestibular system presents an excellent system for studying galvanic neural interface due to the spontaneously firing afferent activity that needs to be either suppressed or excited to convey head motion sensation. We determine the cellular mechanisms underlying the beneficial properties of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) by creating a computational model of the vestibular end organ that elicits all experimentally observed response characteristics to GVS simultaneously. When GVS was modeled to affect the axon alone, the complete experimental data could not be replicated. We found that if GVS affects hair cell vesicle release and axonal excitability simultaneously, our modeling results matched all experimental observations. We conclude that contrary to the conventional belief that GVS affects only axons, the hair cells are likely also affected by this stimulation paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.