Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33748691›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2021

Exploiting hierarchy in medical concept embedding.

Anthony Finch, Alexander Crowell, Mamta Bhatia, Pooja Parameshwarappa, Yung-Chieh Chang, Jose Martinez, Michael Horberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Longitudinal Multimodal Transformer Integrating Imaging and Latent Clinical Signatures From Routine EHRs for Pulmonary Nodule Classification.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  7. Hypergraph Transformers for EHR-based Clinical Predictions.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anthony FinchKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-9391
Alexander CrowellKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-8139
Mamta BhatiaKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7904-2312
Pooja ParameshwarappaKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-2090
Yung-Chieh ChangKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0540-0452
Jose MartinezKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Michael HorbergKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-7646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo construct and publicly release a set of medical concept embeddings for codes following the ICD-10 coding standard which explicitly incorporate hierarchical information from medical codes into the embedding formulation. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe trained concept embeddings using several new extensions to the Word2Vec algorithm using a dataset of approximately 600,000 patients from a major integrated healthcare organization in the Mid-Atlantic US. Our concept embeddings included additional entities to account for the medical categories assigned to codes by the Clinical Classification Software Revised (CCSR) dataset. We compare these results to sets of publicly released pretrained embeddings and alternative training methodologies.

resultsWe found that Word2Vec models which included hierarchical data outperformed ordinary Word2Vec alternatives on tasks which compared naïve clusters to canonical ones provided by CCSR. Our Skip-Gram model with both codes and categories achieved 61.4% normalized mutual information with canonical labels in comparison to 57.5% with traditional Skip-Gram. In models operating on two different outcomes, we found that including hierarchical embedding data improved classification performance 96.2% of the time. When controlling for all other variables, we found that co-training embeddings improved classification performance 66.7% of the time. We found that all models outperformed our competitive benchmarks. DISCUSSION: We found significant evidence that our proposed algorithms can express the hierarchical structure of medical codes more fully than ordinary Word2Vec models, and that this improvement carries forward into classification tasks. As part of this publication, we have released several sets of pretrained medical concept embeddings using the ICD-10 standard which significantly outperform other well-known pretrained vectors on our tested outcomes.

Indexed as

concept embeddingICD-10medical coding

Identifiers

PMID33748691
PMCPMC7962787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.